Jump to content

Kentucky 76 North Carolina 69

AHSPanther23

By AHSPanther23
in College Basketball

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 153
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Hatz

Hatz

Posted
Posted
No sir... It's All Time Low, Hey Monday, and a bunch of other generic band names where all the bands sound exactly the same.

 

See, that can't be as bad as I feared for you. I guess it could always be worse. :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hatz

Hatz

Posted
Posted
Gotta be Virginia and Ralph Sampson

 

It was.

 

Friend of mine here was a journalist at that time. Terry Holland told him off the record that Ralph actually told him he DID NOT want the ball on the last play of his career vs. NC State in the NCAA. :eek:

 

Told me all I wanted to know about him. Here in Wahoo land, many Cav fans like to point out that "Mr. Jefferson's University" went to the Final Four right after Ralph was gone to the NBA. :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
RomanEmpire

RomanEmpire

Posted
Posted

While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5wide

5wide

Posted
Posted
While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me?

 

I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BleedBlue12

BleedBlue12

Posted
Posted
While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me?

 

I thought the same thing when that play happened. Good call. :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tcjkbt

tcjkbt

Posted
Posted
While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me?

 

I agree. Institute the "advantage" rule, which provides that if continued play results in a greater advantage to the non-offending team than the stated penalty for the infraction, then "play on."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.

  I accept