March 28, 201115 yr Please say it isn't a Justin Bieber concert!!?? :scared: No sir... It's All Time Low, Hey Monday, and a bunch of other generic band names where all the bands sound exactly the same.
March 28, 201115 yr No sir... It's All Time Low, Hey Monday, and a bunch of other generic band names where all the bands sound exactly the same. See, that can't be as bad as I feared for you. I guess it could always be worse.
March 28, 201115 yr UK is the first team since 84 to lose the overall #1 in the draft and then make it to the F4. Gotta be Virginia and Ralph Sampson
March 28, 201115 yr Gotta be Virginia and Ralph Sampson It was. Friend of mine here was a journalist at that time. Terry Holland told him off the record that Ralph actually told him he DID NOT want the ball on the last play of his career vs. NC State in the NCAA. :eek: Told me all I wanted to know about him. Here in Wahoo land, many Cav fans like to point out that "Mr. Jefferson's University" went to the Final Four right after Ralph was gone to the NBA. :thumb:
March 29, 201115 yr Don't count the little guys out yet. I agree, Butler is a proven team already and VCU has been flat out scary.
March 29, 201115 yr Based on how they've played in the tournament, VCU would be the favorite in the Final Four if nobody looked at jerseys.
March 29, 201115 yr While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me?
March 29, 201115 yr While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me? I do.
March 29, 201115 yr While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me? I thought the same thing when that play happened. Good call. :thumb:
March 30, 201115 yr While watching the UK/UNC game, there was a situation that brought to light a much needed rule change. In the first half, a UNC player took a shot as the shot clock expired, it was a forced shot and badly missed. UK got the rebound and quickly took off in transition. However, since the shot clock buzzer went off, the refs stopped play and made UK take the ball out of bounds which gave UNC an opportunity to set their defense. Why should any team be penalized in that situation for playing great defense and then having their fast break opportunity taken away? IMO, play should not be stopped if the defensive team gets the rebound. Anyone else agree with me? I agree. Institute the "advantage" rule, which provides that if continued play results in a greater advantage to the non-offending team than the stated penalty for the infraction, then "play on."
March 31, 201115 yr The NBA is investigating Jay-Z's appearance in UK's lockerroom. They have a rule about NBA personnel having contact with players that are not draft-eligible.
March 31, 201115 yr He is probably going to get fined and that will be the end of it. Simply an NBA issue not an NCAA one.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.