Jump to content

theguru

Administrator
  • Posts

    193,958
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    817

theguru last won the day on January 21

theguru had the most liked content!

Reputation

39,689 Excellent

Converted

  • Location
    Florence

Converted

  • Interests
    Kentucky High School Sports, Music, Fitness, Friends, Family.

Converted

  • Occupation
    Founder BluegrassPreps.com

Converted

  • Wide Layout
    Yes

Converted

  • Set Default Read Receipt for Private Messages
    No

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. South Warren is awesome but they are a 6A team and they still are a long way off from beating Trinity. As for Bowling Green, Deuce Bailey is gone and being competitive with X still isn't the top of the mountain. And, in both cases, you are using the extreme, maybe they have a chance teams, but what about all the rest of the teams that get caught up in the fray?
  2. You know, when I post "memes" like that, I cross my fingers that they are accurate. And no one compares to Joe Cool!! Who Dey!
  3. A multiplier in Kentucky would be extremely unfair to almost all of 6A teams and the good 5A teams forced to move up into 6A. None of the current 6A teams or the 5A teams forced to move up would escape the best teams in 6A. In the case of the 5A teams forced to move up, I think it would be so egregious it would actually result in lost enrollment, especially for anyone concentrating on football. Additionally, the good 4A teams forced to move up would still dominate 5A since the good 5A teams would be forced to move up to 6A. CAL would be dominate in 4A once the good teams in 5A are forced to move up. The 2A "Legion of Doom" moving up to 3A would mostly dominate 3A with CAL gone. The top four teams in 1A would be among the best of the best in 2A. 1A would probably benefit... 🤷‍♂️ In short, I think you nailed it @Calico Jack with this sentence: “Congrats on doing everything right—now here’s your "punishment".”
  4. I am surprised no one has taken a swipe at the Indiana model. It looks to me like this model would elevate several teams from every class. Here it is again if anyone wants to play with it. Adopted in 2012, the success factor is built on a point system that evaluates schools’ sport-by-sport postseason finishes over the two years of a standard reclassification period. Any program that wins a sectional championship is assigned one point, with two points credited for a regional championship, three for a semi-state championship and four for a state title. If a school team accrues six or more points during those two seasons, that team will compete in the next-highest classification for the following two-year period. Should the program continue its same level of success in its new classification, it will be moved up once again, with no limit on how high it can climb.
  5. I "challenge" anyone that thinks moving some teams up is a good idea, give us your teams, let's debate it. 🙂
×
×
  • Create New...