cshs81 Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 If I remember correctly in the original discussion of 6-class football, there are not going to be many teams that do NOT make the playoffs. If that's the case, we might as well do like Indiana and invite everyone rather than simply exclude a few. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutigerlb26 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 The idea has always been what is best for the kids and for KY football. In KY everyone goes to the district tournament in basketball, that means everyone gets a post season, a second chance at a title, be it one title, but still everyone gets a shot. In football you might be in a 8 or 9 team district, win 6 games and not have any chance at a post season. While the sister district in the region can have a team win 1 game or even go ofer and make the playoffs. That is fair???? NO it's not. A horrible team gets in and a good one watches the playoffs. A six class system might be what is best, it might not but the majority of coaches in this state feel it is the best decision at this time. The fact is what we have now is not the best system FOR THE KIDS and does need revision. In Indiana everyone goes to the playoffs. Don't see them wishing it were like it is in KY. I am not saying everyone should go to the playoffs, but in my humble opinion a decent team shouldn't be kept out because they are in a severly overloaded district. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malachicrunch Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 If I remember correctly in the original discussion of 6-class football, there are not going to be many teams that do NOT make the playoffs. If that's the case, we might as well do like Indiana and invite everyone rather than simply exclude a few. I know all 4 teams in Highlands district go regardless of record. Home field advantage is what they play for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshs81 Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 I know all 4 teams in Highlands district go regardless of record. Home field advantage is what they play for. Under the initial thinking (subject to change) and the initial class and district breakdowns, there are about 30 teams in the ENTIRE state that would not make the playoffs. If you're going to have that many make it, why not invite the other 30? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lcdawg4life Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 If the 6 classes were passed when would it take effect? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshs81 Posted February 17, 2006 Author Share Posted February 17, 2006 If the 6 classes were passed when would it take effect? I would guess 2007. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leatherneck Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 The idea has always been what is best for the kids and for KY football. In KY everyone goes to the district tournament in basketball, that means everyone gets a post season, a second chance at a title, be it one title, but still everyone gets a shot. In football you might be in a 8 or 9 team district, win 6 games and not have any chance at a post season. While the sister district in the region can have a team win 1 game or even go ofer and make the playoffs. That is fair???? NO it's not. A horrible team gets in and a good one watches the playoffs. A six class system might be what is best, it might not but the majority of coaches in this state feel it is the best decision at this time. The fact is what we have now is not the best system FOR THE KIDS and does need revision. In Indiana everyone goes to the playoffs. Don't see them wishing it were like it is in KY. I am not saying everyone should go to the playoffs, but in my humble opinion a decent team shouldn't be kept out because they are in a severly overloaded district. I think you may be getting ahead of yourself by saying a majority of the coaches in the state think it is the best decision at this time. The Coaches Advisory Committee, which is comprised of a very small number of the coaches in the state, thinks its a good idea (and even then, I don't think the Committee was unanimous in support of 6 classes). To the best of my knowledge, no survey of the entire head coaching rank has been conducted. CoachJ, am I correct? I agree with your point that it is silly that some districts have 8 schools and only four make it and other districts have only 4 schools and all 4 of course make it. But there are other ways to resolve that problem than watering down the championships. And if its all about giving more teams the opportunity to say they made the playoffs, lets let every team in like Indy does, shorten the regular season by a game, eliminate the bye week and tee it up. But be ready for the first two rounds to have some complete blow outs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I have heard for a fact that St. Marys would never start football because the district was sewn up with with Mayfield and Murray High. They could never be competitive. Now you take a district with the Fultons in it, and St. MAry's could be able to compete in a few years.I live in Paducah, and I've never once heard that St. Mary was ever considering adding a football team to its athletic program. Schools add sports because their communities express an interest in fielding a team and to give their students another program in which to participate. Any school that would not add a sport because it felt the "district was sewn up" is taking a very shortsighted approach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 As opposed to everything staying the same, with basically the same teams doing the same...?There is very little wrong with the current system. Six classes is not an improvement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
footballfever Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I like the system the way it is now. 4 teams making the playoffs is good for the fact that playoff spots are not decided until the last week...keeps teams, schools and fans into the entire season instead of being out of playoff hunt week 6 or 7. I dont think 6 classes will hurt Kentucky football at all...... WHAT does eveyone else think about taking top 3 teams with 1 seed getting a bye week 1 in playoffs....I think there a pros and cons to a bye week...if your team has some injuries you can heel up and scout...benefit of being a 1 seed....if you think your team is on a roll a bye may not be a good thing...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandman32 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Checks and balances my man. :thumb: Not everybody is going to agree with each other. I would be curious to see the breakdown of the 6 classes. I think it was on here about 6 months ago. Proposed 6A Paul Dunbar 2187 Avg students Henderson Co Henry Clay Lafayette PRP DuPount Manual Eastern Scott Co Daviess County Senecca Ballard tates Creek Male Butler Madison central Central Hardin Trinity St. Xavier George Rogers Clark Conner Nelson Co. Shelby co. Ryle Campbell County Meade Co Boone Co. Marshall Co. Greenwood Apollo Simon Kenton North Hardin Fern Creek Southern Graves County Bryan Station Christian County John Hardin 1293.5 Avg students Proposed 5A South Laurel 1290 Avg students southwestern North Laurel Oldham Co. Bullitt Central Dixie Heights Grayson Co. Iroquois Barren Co. Whiltley Co. Woodford Co. Montgomery Co. Lincoln co. Scott Ohio County doss Warren Central Waggener Grant Co. Anderson Co Clay Co Madisonville North Hopkins Owensboro Bowling Green Pulaski co. Johnson central North Bullitt Jeffersontown Atherton Perry Co. Central Hopkinsville Central Logan Co. South Oldhman Letcher co. Central Hopkins Co. Central Ashland Paul Blazer 975 Avg students Proposed 4A Madison Southern 972.5 Avg students West Jessamine Boyd co. Harrison Co. Holmes Bullit East East Jessamine Franklin co. Allen Co. Scottsville Covington Catholic Rowan Co\Calloway Co. valley Rockcastle Co. Greenup Co Knox Central Marion County Franklin Simpson Pendleton CO Russell Co. Mcreary Central Boyle co. Lexington Cath. Bell County Western Loan Oak Breckinridge Co. Warren East Fairdale Muhlberg North Bourbon Co. Lawrence Co. Taylor Co. Highlands Mason co. Paducah Tilghman Adair co Larue Co. 747.5 Avg students Proposed 3A Fleming Co. 745 Avg students North Oldham East Ridge Powell Co Union co. Hart Co. Moore East Carter Cawood Garrard Co Mercer Co Wayne Co Western Hills Casey Co Estill Co Magoffin Co Pike Co Central Belfrey West Carter Breathitt Co Spencer co. Butler Co Lewis Co Russell Muhlenberg Morgan Co Jackson Co Knott Co. Central corbin Henry county Sheldon Clark Prestonburg Edmonson co Caldwell co LLoyd Memorial Shawnee Leslie Co. 618.5 Avg students Proposed 2A Lou-Christian acadamey 615 Avg students Trigg Co Washington Co Heath Shelby Valley Owen Co Fort Campbell Webster Co. Todd Co. Central Bath Co. Newport Monroe co. Glasgow Reidland Danville Middlesboro Bardstown Carroll co Murray Fort Knox Owensboro Cath Green Co. Somerset McLean Co. NCC Trimble Co Metcalfe Clinton Co Betsy Lane Holy Cross Cov. Gallatin Ballard Memorial Allen Central Lexington Christian Mayfield Crittendon Co Bishop Brossart 404 Avg students Proposed 1A Bracken Co. 379 Avg students Pikeville Evarts South Floyd Russleville Lynn Camp Campbellsville Nicholas Co Walton Verona Frankfort Berea Holy Cross Lou Beechwood Cumberland Desales Hazard Ludlow Dayton Raceland Phelps Belleview Bethlehem Fairview Fulton Co Paintsville Ky. Country Day Harrodsburg Caverna Harlan Williamsburg Paris Eminence Jenkins Pineville Fulton City Beth Haven Evangel Christian 103 Avg students Here you go Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandman32 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 OK, let me try another spin on this. 4A and 1A are the problem right? Well at least that is the consensus of those proposing this change. Lets examine the disparity a little. In the new 1A, Beechwood and Pikeville would still be in it no matter how you slice it up, how is that helping someone else win a title? The new 6A is still trinity and X's advantage, but the 5A class is kinda interesting. It looks to me that 1A and 2A will just allow the best present 1A teams in a given year to get a title without facing down the next best. But 5A is interesting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandman32 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 There is very little wrong with the current system. Six classes is not an improvement. Really? How many titles have been won by two of the largest schools in 4A since it's creation? How many of the bottom 25 schools have ever made it to the finals, let alone won? I know, do you? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cutigerlb26 Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 I think you may be getting ahead of yourself by saying a majority of the coaches in the state think it is the best decision at this time. The Coaches Advisory Committee, which is comprised of a very small number of the coaches in the state, thinks its a good idea (and even then, I don't think the Committee was unanimous in support of 6 classes). To the best of my knowledge, no survey of the entire head coaching rank has been conducted. CoachJ, am I correct? I agree with your point that it is silly that some districts have 8 schools and only four make it and other districts have only 4 schools and all 4 of course make it. But there are other ways to resolve that problem than watering down the championships. And if its all about giving more teams the opportunity to say they made the playoffs, lets let every team in like Indy does, shorten the regular season by a game, eliminate the bye week and tee it up. But be ready for the first two rounds to have some complete blow outs. Doesn't the Coaches Advisory Committee represent the coaches in their respective regions? My district was asked thier opinion and our represenative expressed our majority opinion. The first two rounds now have complete blowouts, but upsets also occur (if you mention the negative try to point out the positives as well...no matter how small in number they are). But again I never mentioned going to Indiana's playoff system, I just pointed out they are not having the same dispute. 6 classes is not "watering" down the championships, it only acknowledges the disparity in enrollments based on the four classes. Take a peak at the enrollment numbers and notice the disparity in the top vs. the bottom in each class. Like I said, it's about the kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted February 17, 2006 Share Posted February 17, 2006 Really? How many titles have been won by two of the largest schools in 4A since it's creation? How many of the bottom 25 schools have ever made it to the finals, let alone won? I know, do you?I didn't say the system was perfect. In fact, I have suggested that if we have to do something to help the smaller 4A schools, the creation of a 5A class with somewhere between 16-32 schools would be an equitable solution. Nothing will change the dominance of the two schools to which you are referring. If the KHSAA goes to six classes, they will also dominate 6A. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts