jericho Posted December 5, 2016 Author Share Posted December 5, 2016 Do you ever proofread your posts? Just wondering. Yeah but the dumb phone changes it on me after I proof read it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jericho Posted December 5, 2016 Author Share Posted December 5, 2016 Huh? Voting machines can't be hacked. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted December 5, 2016 Share Posted December 5, 2016 Voting machines can't be hacked. Ahhhh! Thanks! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 'Un-recountable precincts' Ingham County clerk explains how precincts can be non-recountable Video. Less than 2 minutes. Its good to know there are safeguards against fraud. After all this process usually takes place days after the event - not weeks. Weeks leads to mischief. This length of time creates a lot of issues. Anyone who does audits knows that time between event and review can be very problematic. Them Ruskies were good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TAC Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I saw an interview with Mrs. Stein. Wow she is something special. First time I've seen her in person. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I saw an interview with Mrs. Stein. Wow she is something special. First time I've seen her in person. That's one way to put it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggclfan Posted December 6, 2016 Share Posted December 6, 2016 I saw an interview with Mrs. Stein. Wow she is something special. First time I've seen her in person. She is something alright... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Millions of wasted dollars later, Trump gains votes during recount in Wisconsin – TheBlaze Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hidinout Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Stein should be punched in the face . So many people could be helped with that 10-15 million bucks . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Next Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Builder1214 Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Next Florida. Any judge that authorizes a recount this late in the game should be removed from the bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted December 7, 2016 Share Posted December 7, 2016 Michigan finding. A sealed ballot box from Detroit was supposed to have 306 votes in it. All documentation, verifications, sign-offs, etc. said 306. How many were really in the box. 50. Story link: BREAKING Michigan Recount Uncovers Serious Voter Fraud in Detroit- VOTES COUNTED UP TO 6 TIMES Link to FB post cited in above: Ken Crider - MUST READ! Penny Crider and I just got back... | Facebook From FB post: Penny’s precinct, Detroit Precinct #152 had an unbroken seal and everything looked proper. The tag on the box said 306 and the book said 306 and the ticket said 306, so there should be 306 paper ballots on the box, right. Well when they pulled out the ballots the stack seemed short and when they finished separating the two page ballot to count the Presidential page only guess how many ballots were in the box? 304 no, 299 nope, 200 nada, how about 100 wrong again. There were only exactly 50 paper ballots in a locked sealed box that again was supposed to have 306. HMMMM. Oh I forgot to add, since there was a discrepancy in the two numbers the original count stands One more thing my precinct (sorry I forgot the number), had 525 votes on the book, tag and ticket and we counted 525 ballots the election official was praising the Lord “Hallelujah we have a countable precinct” Jill Stein had three (3) votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawildcat Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 US judge rejects Green Party'''s Pennsylvania recount case A federal judge on Monday issued a stinging rejection of a Green Party-backed request to recount paper ballots in Pennsylvania's presidential election, won narrowly by Republican Donald Trump, and scan some counties' election systems for signs of hacking. In his 31-page decision, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond said there were at least six grounds that required him to reject the Green Party's lawsuit, which had been opposed by Trump, the Pennsylvania Republican Party and the Pennsylvania attorney general's office. The Green Party has been successful in at least getting statewide recounts started in Wisconsin and Michigan, but it has failed to get a statewide recount begun or ordered in Pennsylvania. Suspicion of a hacked Pennsylvania election "borders on the irrational" while granting the Green Party's recount bid could "ensure that that no Pennsylvania vote counts" given Tuesday's federal deadline to certify the vote for the Electoral College, wrote Diamond, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, a Republican. "Most importantly, there is no credible evidence that any 'hack' occurred, and compelling evidence that Pennsylvania's voting system was not in any way compromised," Diamond wrote. He also said the lawsuit suffered from a lack of standing, potentially the lack of federal jurisdiction and an "unexplained, highly prejudicial" wait before filing last week's lawsuit, four weeks after the Nov. 8 election. The decision was the Green Party's latest roadblock in Pennsylvania after hitting numerous walls in county and state courts. Green Party-backed lawyers argue that it was possible that computer hackers changed the election outcome and that Pennsylvania's heavy use of paperless machines makes it a prime target. Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein also contended that Pennsylvania has erected unconstitutional barriers to voters seeking a recount. A lawyer for the Green Party said Monday they were disappointed and unable to immediately say whether they would appeal. "But one thing is clear," said the lawyer, Ilann Maazel. "The Pennsylvania election system is not fair to voters and voters don't know if their votes counted, and that's a very large problem." It is part of a broader effort by Stein to recount votes in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, three states with a history of supporting Democrats that were narrowly won by Trump over Democrat Hillary Clinton. Stein captured about 1 percent of the vote, or less, in each of the three states. In Pennsylvania, Trump beat Clinton in Pennsylvania by about 44,000 votes out of 6 million cast. The Wisconsin recount was expected to conclude Monday. With about 95 percent of the votes recounted as of Sunday, Clinton had gained 25 votes on Trump, but still trailed by about 22,000 votes out of nearly 3 million cast in Wisconsin. A federal judge halted Michigan's recount last week after three days. Trump won Michigan by fewer than 11,000 votes out of nearly 4.8 million votes cast. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleluck55 Posted December 12, 2016 Share Posted December 12, 2016 So do the people who donated to the cause get their money back since they didn't recount MI or PA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jericho Posted December 12, 2016 Author Share Posted December 12, 2016 Better question is when will all this crybaby stuff stop.. Move the heck on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts