Jump to content

Ranking committee is a joke


CBDV

Recommended Posts

ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

 

Blame the Big 12 conference. Had they declared Baylor the true champion, I have a feeling they are in. They didnt, co champions, OSU is in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

 

What was FSU's worst loss?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Blame the Big 12 conference. Had they declared Baylor the true champion, I have a feeling they are in. They didnt, co champions, OSU is in.

 

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

 

Agreed, but still probably wouldn't have been good enough. Have a conference championship game; that gets the champ another quality opponent on the resume.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

 

Problem is they have one in the Big 12, the Big 12 chose not to use it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Which makes me wonder if the Big 12 was paid not to use the tiebreaker so that OSU could get it by the NCAA.

 

Big 12 got greedy. They tried to help TCU by not declaring Baylor the outright champion and it may have cost them getting either team in. Baylor's coach was NOT happy it either. Rightfully so IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.