ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

 

Blame the Big 12 conference. Had they declared Baylor the true champion, I have a feeling they are in. They didnt, co champions, OSU is in.

ACC is 5th rated conference, BIG10 is 4th.

 

 

BIG12 is 2nd.

 

 

BIG10 champ is beaten by #10 in the ACC..........

 

 

They aren't holding it against Ohio St. because their best player was hurt against VaTech.....but are giving them MORE credit because they are on their 3rd string QB.

 

 

FSU best win - #12 GaTech.

 

OSU best win - #7 MichSt.

 

Baylor best win - #6 TCU

 

Makes 0 sense.

 

What was FSU's worst loss?

What was FSU's worst loss?

 

That trick play the scout team beat them on last week in practice when they tried the mooing cow play.

Blame the Big 12 conference. Had they declared Baylor the true champion, I have a feeling they are in. They didnt, co champions, OSU is in.

 

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

 

Agreed, but still probably wouldn't have been good enough. Have a conference championship game; that gets the champ another quality opponent on the resume.

Agree. Co-champion label may have been the decider. Its OK to not have a championship game but have a tie-breaker system to address the situation of this year. Baylor should have been named THE B12 Champion - and then they have a stronger case to get in.

 

Problem is they have one in the Big 12, the Big 12 chose not to use it.

Problem is they have one in the Big 12, the Big 12 chose not to use it.

 

Which makes me wonder if the Big 12 was paid not to use the tiebreaker so that OSU could get it by the NCAA.

Which makes me wonder if the Big 12 was paid not to use the tiebreaker so that OSU could get it by the NCAA.

 

No title game killed them.

I think they got the correct four teams in the correct order; although an argument could be made for Oregon over Alabama.

 

That was their job.

Which makes me wonder if the Big 12 was paid not to use the tiebreaker so that OSU could get it by the NCAA.

 

Really? Are you being serious? Do you believe we landed a man on the moon?

You have to have 12 teams to have a championship game, correct?

Really? Are you being serious? Do you believe we landed a man on the moon?

 

Yes, why would you have a tie breaker ruling in your league bylaws and choose not to use it?

Which makes me wonder if the Big 12 was paid not to use the tiebreaker so that OSU could get it by the NCAA.

 

Big 12 got greedy. They tried to help TCU by not declaring Baylor the outright champion and it may have cost them getting either team in. Baylor's coach was NOT happy it either. Rightfully so IMO.

Baylor beat 2 top 10 teams, OSU 1, and TCU 0. OSU also has the worst loss by far and plays in the worst conference of all three teams. Seems pretty clear who has the best resume.