Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

What is the primary responsibility of newspapers?

What is the role of newspapers & tv news programs? 28 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the role of newspapers & tv news programs?

    • It's all about being accurate and ethical
      32%
      9
    • Mostly about being accurate/ethical, but you have to consider what will sell
      32%
      9
    • Accuracy & Ethics is no more/less important than sales revenue
      3%
      1
    • Accuracy & Ethics are OK, but they take a back seat to sales
      3%
      1
    • It's all about the bottom line
      28%
      8

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

So much was made of the X & T article the other day I thought I'd give this thread a shot. What is the primary role of a newspaper or TV news program? Is it to be accurate and unbiased or is their first responsibility to sell papers/ads?

I believe 50 years ago this question would not be an issue. Journalism was all about accuracy and integrity. I think the pendulum has shifted, but how much?

  • Replies 50
  • Views 3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

As with almost everything in life these days, it's all about the bottom line...

It should be about accuracy and ethics; but you have to play to your audience.

 

I think these ideals are a consideration for most news outlets...just not the only considerations.

If it is all about accuracy and ethics and that doesn't sell, than you are out of business.

As with almost everything in life these days, it's all about the bottom line...

 

… which, unfortunately, sometimes forces otherwise ethical and accurate people to have to suppress those good traits so that some bean-counter in an office far away makes their quarterly bonus.

I believe 50 years ago this question would not be an issue. Journalism was all about accuracy and integrity. I think the pendulum has shifted, but how much?

 

Of course I wasn't around 50 years ago but I would say that it was never ALL about accuracy and integrity. The bottom line has always been the major concern.

Of course I wasn't around 50 years ago but I would say that it was never ALL about accuracy and integrity. The bottom line has always been the major concern.

 

Not to the degree it is today. Main reason: Newspapers then were mostly family-owned as opposed to the corporate conglomerations that run the newspaper world nowadays. Those families lived in and felt a responsibility to the communities where there newspapers were based. Absentee ownership is, IMO, the biggest reason for the decline in quality of newspapers and a lowering of newspapers' credibility in the public eye.

 

I can't speak to TV and radio as much, but I know many of the same problems have killed the quality of those mediums.

Not to the degree it is today. Main reason: Newspapers then were mostly family-owned as opposed to the corporate conglomerations that run the newspaper world nowadays. Those families lived in and felt a responsibility to the communities where there newspapers were based. Absentee ownership is, IMO, the biggest reason for the decline in quality of newspapers and a lowering of newspapers' credibility in the public eye.

 

I can't speak to TV and radio as much, but I know many of the same problems have killed the quality of those mediums.

 

It was much easier to make a profit back then. In many cases, it was the primary source of news for folks.

 

Competition from many sources has causes traditional news to lean towards entertainment because we as a society demand it.

Seeing as how the size of most newspapers is dictated by the amount of ads sold and not the amount of news stories written, I will venture to say it's about the bottom line.

Seeing as how the size of most newspapers is dictated by the amount of ads sold and not the amount of news stories written, I will venture to say it's about the bottom line.

 

I agree, but if its subscribers cared more about truth and accuracy than fanaticism and trivial Hollwood-esque waste we wouldn't be having this debate.

As with almost everything in life these days, it's all about the bottom line...
:thumb: :thumb: :thumb:

Are we talking newspapers with huge circulation, or local papers? Does that make a difference?

I agree, but if its subscribers cared more about truth and accuracy than fanaticism and trivial Hollwood-esque waste we wouldn't be having this debate.

It has nothing to do with subscribers. It has to do with the advertisers.

Like any other business, the responsibility is to make a profit. That core requirement is important for the owner, employee and the reader who depends on the newspaper.

It has nothing to do with subscribers. It has to do with the advertisers.

 

If readers are turned off by a newspaper, who exactly are advertisers advertising to?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.