CatsCatsCats Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 I do. Bird would make the whole team better. He would work make Tyson Chandler an all star, Stevenson. A dead eye long range sniper, Kidd 5 years younger and Barea the 6th Man of the Year. And they still wouldn't be better than the Lakers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malachicrunch Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Kind of an amusing thread. Let's begin with the premise of the thread. Let's remember that Bird played on some great teams in his prime. Put him in a similar situation now, then yes he is easily a hall of famer. Put him on the Timberwolves, probably a different story. Now moving on, The Dirk comparison would be valid, if Dirk had a couple of rings. Guess that goes back to you can only be as good historically as the teams you play with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Kind of an amusing thread. Let's begin with the premise of the thread. Let's remember that Bird played on some great teams in his prime. Put him in a similar situation now, then yes he is easily a hall of famer. Put him on the Timberwolves, probably a different story. Now moving on, The Dirk comparison would be valid, if Dirk had a couple of rings. Guess that goes back to you can only be as good historically as the teams you play with. Rings has nothing to do with it, IMO. Two completely different styles of play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 And they still wouldn't be better than the Lakers. I don't know. Bird elevates everyone's game. Who knows exactly how good they could be with Bird minus Dirk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malachicrunch Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Rings has nothing to do with it, IMO. Two completely different styles of play. I don't really like making comparisons. You may be right. However I seem to be reading a lot of opinion on here that disagrees about the styles of play. I also disagree with rings having a lot to do with the perception of greatness in the NBA. Take a look at the "Top 50 Greatest in History" Lot of rings with that crowd. http://www.nba.com/history/players/50greatest.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsCatsCats Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 I don't know. Bird elevates everyone's game. Who knows exactly how good they could be with Bird minus Dirk. They'd still have Jason Kidd who's almost ready to go to into a retirement home, Shawn Marion who hasn't been revelant since 2005, Tyson Chandler who plays when he wants to get paid, Barea who is literally my size, Roddy Beaubois who is a poor man's Jason Terry, and Jason Terry who is a poor man's Nick Van Exel. Not to mention Brendan Haywood who was the Tyson Chandler of last season. That team doesn't look like one that beats LA to me. And I didn't even mention Peja in that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 They'd still have Jason Kidd who's almost ready to go to into a retirement home, Shawn Marion who hasn't been revelant since 2005, Tyson Chandler who plays when he wants to get paid, Barea who is literally my size, Roddy Beaubois who is a poor man's Jason Terry, and Jason Terry who is a poor man's Nick Van Exel. Not to mention Brendan Haywood who was the Tyson Chandler of last season. That team doesn't look like one that beats LA to me. And I didn't even mention Peja in that. Chris Paul just beat the Lakers and you are trying to tell me that Bird can't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsCatsCats Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Chris Paul just beat the Lakers and you are trying to tell me that Bird can't? Let me know when the Hornets win the series. I do feel better about my OKC pick though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted April 17, 2011 Share Posted April 17, 2011 Let me know when the Hornets win the series. I do feel better about my OKC pick though. OKC needs to beat the Nuggets first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Anyone that thinks Larry Bird wouldn't be an NBA star in any era is nuts ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatsCatsCats Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Is there a former star you guys don't think would be good today? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Kevin McHale, Robert Parish and James Worthy come to mind. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Kevin McHale, Robert Parish and James Worthy come to mind.Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Is there a former star you guys don't think would be good today? Why would a player who was a former star not be good today? Is it because you think there are better athletes today? I don't think so. I think there is better training. But I think any player that was a star in his era would train like the athletes of this era and be just as good if not better. It is all relative to the standards of each era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wireman Posted April 18, 2011 Share Posted April 18, 2011 Larry Bird, Michael Jordan, Magic Johnson, Charles Barkley...all would star today. No question about it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts