UKMustangFan Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 And then yearly maintenance. How many games a year would be in the stadium roughly? It would have to be a pretty decent number to make it worth that. 17 matches a season. Assumption is the infrastructure would also be used to attract/support business development in the area as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawildcat Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 So how many games a year are we talking here? How much money are they asking for infrastructure improvements? MLS plays 34 regular season games. 17 home and 17 away. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 MLS plays 34 regular season games. 17 home and 17 away. Plus preseason, any scheduled friendlies, and potential US Open Cup and playoff home games. Still not a ton without other events to supplement venue income. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 If you could guarantee there are going to be others events or even other teams playing there at times and you are looking at 30+ events a year it might be worth it. I don't think 17 is enough IMO. I know it's not the same, but PBS leaves such a bad taste in my mouth for 10 football games a year. Everyone knows it was a waste from the start. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 This is a sideshow. PBS says they haven't even been approached by the county about using the stadium for MLS. :lol2: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 If you could guarantee there are going to be others events or even other teams playing there at times and you are looking at 30+ events a year it might be worth it. I don't think 17 is enough IMO. I know it's not the same, but PBS leaves such a bad taste in my mouth for 10 football games a year. Everyone knows it was a waste from the start. Everything about PBS sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KentuckyJoe Posted November 15, 2017 Share Posted November 15, 2017 #FCNEWPORT Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nees1212 Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Why isn't PBS a viable option? All I've read from FCC is that it won't work, but I've never heard any reasoning why other than MLS prefers teams to have their own stadium. There are currently 3 or 4 MSL teams sharing a stadium with a NFL or MLB team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Why isn't PBS a viable option? All I've read from FCC is that it won't work, but I've never heard any reasoning why other than MLS prefers teams to have their own stadium. There are currently 3 or 4 MSL teams sharing a stadium with a NFL or MLB team. Qualifying specs put out by MLS say you have to have a soccer only stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nees1212 Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Qualifying specs put out by MLS say you have to have a soccer only stadium. Outside of the local news, is there any documentation from MLS saying a soccer only stadium is required for expansion? Everything I've read in regards to the requirements put out by MLS is that the stadium is preferably a soccer-only stadium. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Outside of the local news, is there any documentation from MLS saying a soccer only stadium is required for expansion? Everything I've read in regards to the requirements put out by MLS is that the stadium is preferably a soccer-only stadium. Like everything with MLS, it's a rule right up until it's not. They'll make exceptions when they feel like it (we want Manchester City's ownership group to be in the league so NYCFC can play at Yankee Stadium). Those exceptions definitely tend to favor the biggest markets and most powerful owners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Like everything with MLS, it's a rule right up until it's not. They'll make exceptions when they feel like it (we want Manchester City's ownership group to be in the league so NYCFC can play at Yankee Stadium). Those exceptions definitely tend to favor the biggest markets and most powerful owners. The MLS is the only league that can make the NFL look fair by comparison. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 The MLS is the only league that can make the NFL look fair by comparison. Agreed. I'd probably get suspended for the kinds of things I'd type if I got going about the way they're steamrolling the supporters in Columbus right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpa2825 Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 Outside of the local news, is there any documentation from MLS saying a soccer only stadium is required for expansion? Everything I've read in regards to the requirements put out by MLS is that the stadium is preferably a soccer-only stadium. It's also "bendable" to play in an existing co-tenant situation so long as there is a "soccer only" stadium on the drawing board in a realistic timeframe. Would be interesting to see if FCC has the "stones" to call MLS' bluff. Don't commit but show the possibilities and see if they get franchise awarded. If yes, slow roll things for the best deal while still playing at Nippert and keeping most happy. (Of course, FCC misses out on most/all concessions at Nippert which is a big chunk of change. If they self-fund in Newport, they get to keep all of that.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted November 16, 2017 Share Posted November 16, 2017 This was a pretty fun article. For the TL;DR folks, here's a summary: FC Cincinnati has done something amazing; they've done it without MLS; MLS isn't that great; what they're doing to Columbus they can do to you; FC Cincinnati doesn't need MLS. Hartman: The FC Cincinnati-MLS saga is outrageously stupid Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts