Republicans wage war on women; the Tea Party wages war on books. And you wonder why people vote Democrat.

 

So they can take part in the Democrat Party's war on babies?

This is the No. 1 story in this morning's Enquirer.

 

You never answer a question. Why is that?

You never answer a question. Why is that?

O Captain, My Captain: The majority of questions are either (a) rhetorical or (b) of the 'when did you stop beating your wife?' variety. Hence, I'm reluctant to wade into that tit-for-tat pool. But since you ask for an answer to All Tell's question, I will provide one, even though it is off-topic: If one is upset with Roe v. Wade, why in the world isn't your ire directed at the five conservative Roman Catholic Republicans who constitute a majority on the U.S. Supreme Court? What are you waiting for? Grant to take Richmond?

But you're more then willing to sling hyperbole and Baby Killer Party propaganda. Just want to make sure the rules you have set are well known to everyone.

 

And FWIW my question was rhetorical and I expected no answer but maybe, just maybe you could TRY to answer some of the specific questions you were asked regarding legalities and ends justifying means.

 

I won't hold my breath.

Edited May 20, 201313 yr by All Tell

Doesn't the supreme court have to have the case brought before them to act ? has this SC been ask to rule about R V W ?

But you're more then willing to sling hyperbole and Baby Killer Party propaganda. Just want to make sure the rules you have set are well known to everyone.

 

And FWIW my question was rhetorical and I expected no answer but maybe, just maybe you could TRY to answer some of the specific questions you were asked regarding legalities and ends justifying means.

 

I won't hold my breath.

No illegalities (library case) until the fat old men in black robes sing. That could be a while. Interesting twists in the NKY twin cases. Could the Campbell County Library District actually be serious about possibly closing the Ft. Thomas branch? That would certainly put the Tea Party at odds with the Republicans in Ft. Thomas. Campbell realtors also would howl like banshees, too. Stay tuned.

 

By the way, as far as rules ... there aren't any as long as you keep things sort of civil. I believe that's the way this dialogue works.

Doesn't the supreme court have to have the case brought before them to act ? has this SC been ask to rule about R V W ?

Yes. No.

Are we talking about the library or the IRS?

Yeah, I agree. Funny how the deflection tactics work, isn't it?

Best Baby Killer Party tactics. When you have a losing issue throw hyperbole and change the subject.

O Captain, My Captain: The majority of questions are either (a) rhetorical or (b) of the 'when did you stop beating your wife?' variety. Hence, I'm reluctant to wade into that tit-for-tat pool. But since you ask for an answer to All Tell's question, I will provide one, even though it is off-topic: If one is upset with Roe v. Wade, why in the world isn't your ire directed at the five conservative Roman Catholic Republicans who constitute a majority on the U.S. Supreme Court? What are you waiting for? Grant to take Richmond?

 

So, in other words, you can't answer the questions so you just ignore them.

Yes. No.

 

So why would you want anyone to be upset with the 5 "conservative R judges" if they cant rule on the case you mention ? makes no sense .

So, in other words, you can't answer the questions so you just ignore them.

 

 

Don't forget he tries to act like he's the smartest kid in class.

Now we find out that over 90 IRS employees were involved and over 500 groups and individuals were targeted.. Not just a few rouge employees as the white house stated.

Now we find out that over 90 IRS employees were involved and over 500 groups and individuals were targeted.. Not just a few rouge employees as the white house stated.

Rouge ? as in Baton Rouge ? Red !!!?

Rouge ? as in Baton Rouge ? Red !!!?

 

See post #204