Jump to content

IRS apologizes for targeting conservative groups

FarBeyondDriven
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 261
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

All Tell

All Tell

Posted
Posted

I know the difference between rogue and rouge. Pointing out a typo would definitely be and example of trying to divert the attention from a losing issue that I alluded to in #204. Hey I've done it to, when I have a losing argument I've resorted to trying to be the spelling police.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bluegrasscard

Bluegrasscard

Posted
Posted
I know the difference between rogue and rouge. Pointing out a typo would definitely be and example of trying to divert the attention from a losing issue that I alluded to in #204. Hey I've done it to, when I have a losing argument I've resorted to trying to be the spelling police.

 

Based on this photo...Rogue is correct.

 

IRS 2 employees.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LIPTON BASH

LIPTON BASH

Posted
Posted

 

I was just about to post a new thread for this . So the guy in charge of the IRS is married to a woman who works for a liberal group whose soul goal is to destroy conservative PACs. So I'm suppose to believe she didn't influence her husband ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bluegrasscard

Bluegrasscard

Posted
Posted
I was just about to post a new thread for this . So the guy in charge of the IRS is married to a woman who works for a liberal group whose soul goal is to destroy conservative PACs. So I'm suppose to believe she didn't influence her husband ?

 

No conflict of interest for an 'independent' agency there...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dlbdonn

Dlbdonn

Posted
Posted
I know the difference between rogue and rouge. Pointing out a typo would definitely be and example of trying to divert the attention from a losing issue that I alluded to in #204. Hey I've done it to, when I have a losing argument I've resorted to trying to be the spelling police.
No I just like pointing out grammar and vocabulary mistakes , just ask my wife and children .
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Twotoplace

Twotoplace

Posted
Posted
I was just about to post a new thread for this . So the guy in charge of the IRS is married to a woman who works for a liberal group whose soul goal is to destroy conservative PACs. So I'm suppose to believe she didn't influence her husband ?

Bash -- This is almost as bad as Clarence Thomas ruling on the Affordable Health Care Act while his wife Ginni raked in more than a million bucks lobbying to defeat said act. Yet Clancy says this is all above-board. Ha ha ha.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LIPTON BASH

LIPTON BASH

Posted
Posted
Bash -- This is almost as bad as Clarence Thomas ruling on the Affordable Health Care Act while his wife Ginni raked in more than a million bucks lobbying to defeat said act. Yet Clancy says this is all above-board. Ha ha ha.

 

If you want to discuss this start a thread. No more deflections .

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Professor

The Professor

Posted
Posted

Hal Rogers, who is chairman of the Appropriations Committee, was just on Fox News talking about the wasteful spending at conference meetings of IRS workers. Some hotel rooms were $1,500 per night. He also suspects that people higher up the totem pole that were in control of decisions are using lower level workers as scapegoats in the targeting Tea Party members and other conservative groups. He also threw out a word I haven't heard much since the Watergate days, "enemies list". Seems the IRS had one. These Watergate terms may become more familiar in the next few months. "Stonewall", anyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.

  I accept