LittleRoyal Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 That's easy to say ... if you're from Mason County. I didn't graduate from Mason Co. I married into it. So I know for a fact that I'm right. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bricklayer Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 It's always going to be someones home court unless you move it to NKU. I believe that GRC has more regional titles than Mason Co. Does anyone have statistics? It doesn't matter if Mason Co. was at the bottom of the region and had never won a title, hosting the region at the same regional school each year can not be justified. No one argues the tradition at the Fieldhouse and that tradition should continue EVERY TIME IT IS THEIR TURN TO HOST THE TOURNAMENT. Every other region in the state that doesn't have a neutral site experiences years where a smaller school hosts the regional tournament...it is the only justifiable way IMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Charms Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 :thumb: They tried this rule at Georgetown College... what ended up happening was that when the men's team played at 2 on Saturday and the girls played at 4 - so many fans left after the mens game that the womens team felt terrible. It was very hard on them to warm up while so many fans were filing out. The women's team coach was a major Title 9 advocate and didn't care that playing early was tearing up her team mentally. She refused to change back until she got wind that the men's coach actually LIKED playing the early game. I agree that the girls should have the same quality uniforms and the same opportunity to win games, but I do not agree with any of this playing first or second or on a particular night stuff. The fans are going to come to the games they want to see no matter when anyone plays... :thumb: This is a must read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAMEL1 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Dont you guys see it? Its all about Montgomery Co. getting a piece of the pie!!!! Forget all the particulars, its all about dollars and cents. That is exactly what is happening. This way Mason County is sure to get a first round game every year and probably host every other year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gchs_uk9 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 They tried this rule at Georgetown College... what ended up happening was that when the men's team played at 2 on Saturday and the girls played at 4 - so many fans left after the mens game that the womens team felt terrible. It was very hard on them to warm up while so many fans were filing out. The women's team coach was a major Title 9 advocate and didn't care that playing early was tearing up her team mentally. She refused to change back until she got wind that the men's coach actually LIKED playing the early game. I agree that the girls should have the same quality uniforms and the same opportunity to win games, but I do not agree with any of this playing first or second or on a particular night stuff. The fans are going to come to the games they want to see no matter when anyone plays... Very well said. I'm all for girls getting equal money, equal equipment, equal everything. But schedule the games to draw the maximum crowd, the kids deserve it. And proper scheduling means bigger crowds, thus more money. More money = better everything listed above. I mean its not like schools were forcing girls to play at 7:30 on Wednesday mornings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 On the scheduling of games, as a coach I wanted Tuesday games more than Friday games. Tuesday games meant I had a day of practice before the game. Monday games, which was a traditional girls' night, meant either a Sunday practice (which I abhor) or no practice day before a game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAMEL1 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Keep it the same. Some of the smaller schools rarely get to play in the "BIG SHOW", and the "BIG SHOW" is at the Fieldhouse! Keep it the same. Look at this, we agree on keeping it the same for this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAMEL1 Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 It's always going to be someones home court unless you move it to NKU. I believe that GRC has more regional titles than Mason Co. Does anyone have statistics? Unless NKU lets the schools use it for free, I don't think it will ever be there!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BEARFACTS Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 That's easy to say ... if you're from Mason County. AGREE 100 % Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gold sunrise Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 AGREE 100 % Me too.:thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
region12hoops Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Regional tourney's are played at Murray St, WKU, one of Frankfort civic center, memorial col. or EKU and also at Morehead. Does anyone know what it cost's for the them to have regional tourney's at those places? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philip Hay Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Why is Mason County always made to be the villian in this discussion? KHSAA rules read: The Commissioner shall determine the regional tournament sites. Schools interested in hosting a regional tournament must submit their request through the defined site selection process at prior year tournaments. The Commissioner’s office may use this site selection plan as a guide, but is not bound by this plan in determining the sites. So how is this Mason County's fault? Later it states: Case TR-13- How are regional basketball tournament sites selected? The placement of the regional basketball tournaments is at the discretion of the Commissioner. The member schools in each region were to have met (principals and/ or athletic directors) in September, 1998 to adopt a plan for designating the site within each region and must regularly revise the plan and submit those plan revisions to the KHSAA. A two-thirds vote is necessary to adopt any plan for recommending the regional tournament sites and voting shall include boys’ and girls’ sites. Criteria to be considered by the schools include but are not limited to- satisfactory capacity within the gym to safely accommodate past (five years) and expected attendance numbers; a minimum of four dressing rooms and an officials dressing room if double headers are to be played; and adequate parking for projected attendance. In addition, discussion must occur regarding a clarification on the amount of proceeds (if any) that is to be kept by the host school as well as limitations on expenses by the host school; determining the amount and/or percentages to be given to each school that participates; the amount and/or percentages to be given to each team in the region not competing in the tournament; and the disbursement of any proceeds from commissions, parking, advertising and any other revenue related to the tournament but not directly related to ticket, program or novelty sales. Why always point the finger (sometimes not the correct one, if you know what I mean :lol: ) at Mason County? If there is a problem with where the tournament is being played, why is it Mason County's fault? Sounds to me that the 10th Region schools are following KHSAA rules. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
basketball peanut Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 To me, it does not matter where the regional tournament is held, as long as it is held at the same place. If someone else comes up with a gymnasium that can hold the regional crowd than they have a right to host it. However, the atmosphere of a regional tournament can not be felt at four sites in one night. There is an aura about being in the regional tournament. It is the feeling of playing in a bigger gym in front of the largest crowd of the season for most schools. I never can figure out why people who think they are in charge of the whole world (I think his name was mentioned in an earlier post) think they can mess with the tradition of 10th region basketball by trying to change everything when they don't think their wallet will be as thick this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcpapa Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Why is Mason County always made to be the villian in this discussion? Philip, I always wondered the same thing. Some folks have always made it (the playing of the boys' regional tournament every year at The Fieldhouse) out to be strictly a Mason County decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mhighfield Posted January 12, 2007 Share Posted January 12, 2007 Why is Mason County always made to be the villian in this discussion? KHSAA rules read: The Commissioner shall determine the regional tournament sites. Schools interested in hosting a regional tournament must submit their request through the defined site selection process at prior year tournaments. The Commissioner’s office may use this site selection plan as a guide, but is not bound by this plan in determining the sites. So how is this Mason County's fault? Later it states: Case TR-13- How are regional basketball tournament sites selected? The placement of the regional basketball tournaments is at the discretion of the Commissioner. The member schools in each region were to have met (principals and/ or athletic directors) in September, 1998 to adopt a plan for designating the site within each region and must regularly revise the plan and submit those plan revisions to the KHSAA. A two-thirds vote is necessary to adopt any plan for recommending the regional tournament sites and voting shall include boys’ and girls’ sites. Criteria to be considered by the schools include but are not limited to- satisfactory capacity within the gym to safely accommodate past (five years) and expected attendance numbers; a minimum of four dressing rooms and an officials dressing room if double headers are to be played; and adequate parking for projected attendance. In addition, discussion must occur regarding a clarification on the amount of proceeds (if any) that is to be kept by the host school as well as limitations on expenses by the host school; determining the amount and/or percentages to be given to each school that participates; the amount and/or percentages to be given to each team in the region not competing in the tournament; and the disbursement of any proceeds from commissions, parking, advertising and any other revenue related to the tournament but not directly related to ticket, program or novelty sales. Why always point the finger (sometimes not the correct one, if you know what I mean :lol: ) at Mason County? If there is a problem with where the tournament is being played, why is it Mason County's fault? Sounds to me that the 10th Region schools are following KHSAA rules. AMEN,And sounds like to me the 2/3 vote goes the majority of the 10th region schools vote for Mason so dont hate us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts