cshs81 Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Yes. Bill Clinton was the down fall of America's youth. He and that darn American Bandstand. . That's funny. I give it an 85. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandit29 Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Oral sex is sex without intercourse. Would you "libs" be happy if your loved one had oral sex with someone else? You make it sound like there is nothing wrong with teens thinking there is nothing wrong with it. Just an example of the moral value of the left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the mathemagician Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 I blame Clinton that I have to explain to my students about oral exams and why oral exams are still exams, just without the pencil and the paper. An if you take an oral exam, don't lie about it. For goodness sakes, tell you mama you did it. Darn Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms Liberty Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Oral sex is sex without intercourse. Would you "libs" be happy if your loved one had oral sex with someone else? You make it sound like there is nothing wrong with teens thinking there is nothing wrong with it. Just an example of the moral value of the left. I strongly agree :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshs81 Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 I blame Clinton that I have to explain to my students about oral exams and why oral exams are still exams, just without the pencil and the paper. An if you take an oral exam, don't lie about it. For goodness sakes, tell you mama you did it. Darn Clinton. Nicely done. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hatz Posted January 4, 2008 Share Posted January 4, 2008 Oral sex is sex without intercourse. Would you "libs" be happy if your loved one had oral sex with someone else? You make it sound like there is nothing wrong with teens thinking there is nothing wrong with it. Just an example of the moral value of the left. Just curious why you have to resort to some sort of catagorization and/or name calling (at least in your mind) on this subject. It is not a liberal/conservative issue. My guess is Newt Gingrich was doing the same thing with someone who wasn't his wife at the time he was ripping Clinton for his adultery. I'd like to know who in this thread was glib about it. Even the closest to glib is that the activity and thought behind Clinton predates his time in the White House. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ms Liberty Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 The difference it that you are guessing about Newt, its a fact about Clinton. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
duck1220 Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 Is it really sex? It depends on what your definition of is, IS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandit29 Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 Good one Duck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcpapa Posted January 5, 2008 Share Posted January 5, 2008 I guess I'm a "lib", as opposed to a "con". :thumb: My point was that this mindset didn't originate with WJC. To insinuate that thousands if not millions of pre-teens all of a sudden thought "if my president thinks it's all right, it must be all right" is quite a reach. Heck, if that were true, everybody would be going around using the term "strategery". (Rush doesn't count). And my (very educated) guess is that Newt was doing more than the topic of this thread with a person(s) other than his spouse. One of any number of reasons why he is absolutely unelectable at present. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts