Jump to content

What Baseball Stats are over-rated?


Recommended Posts

Disagree on saves being overrated. Important aspect, of finishing a game and 6-8 blown saves, can oft be the difference in 1st-3rd.

 

I feel several are "overrated" and in no order....

 

K's - strikeouts, not an accurate measure of a pitchers effectiveness.

SB's - stolen bases, lost fundamental of the game

CG - complete games, a thing of the past in MLB

ERA's - can be misleading

WP's - wild pitches, serve little purpose

HBP's - give an indication, of on the plate/little fear

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion on some under-rated stats in baseball:

 

* Runs Produced (Runs + Rbi - HR's)

* On-base Pct.

* Slugging Pct.

* Total Bases

* Outfield Assists

* WHIP

* Percentage of inherited runners scored

* Stolen base pct.

 

Over-Rated:

* Fielding Pct.

* Pitcher's win/loss

* Batting Average

* Strikeouts (both for pitchers and hitters)

* Gold Glove winners (rarely goes to best defenders)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone who has read much of Bill James' work and likes numbers will be familiar with some of his concepts; including "runs created", "win shares", "range factor", etc. as more accurate indicators than RBI, W-L, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under or over-rated?

 

Sorry for not clarifying. Quality starts are UNDER-rated. Some automatically say "but a starter can go 6 innings, give up 3 runs and have an ERA of 4.50". While technically true, that rarely happens, and in fact, quality starts in the aggregate are so much "better" statistically than non-quality starts as to defy conventional wisdom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for not clarifying. Quality starts are UNDER-rated. Some automatically say "but a starter can go 6 innings, give up 3 runs and have an ERA of 4.50". While technically true, that rarely happens, and in fact, quality starts in the aggregate are so much "better" statistically than non-quality starts as to defy conventional wisdom.

 

:thumb: :thumb:

 

Than I agree. I wasn't sure which way you were going.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree that K's are not an important statistic. If a pitcher doesn't let you put the ball in play it's tough to score. For a hitter the more you put the ball in play especially w/ people on base more good thiings can happen.

 

I think ground ball ratio for pitchers is way under-rated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.