Jump to content

Trump and Putin meeting


Recommended Posts

I'm talking about the DNC getting outed for all of their shady dealings...nobody was concerned where the information came from when Bush secrets were revealed by WikiLeaks, not concern about them being illegally obtained. All that we heard was thankfully the truth came out :lol2: When the DNC is caught rigging their own primaries, caught making racist and anti semantic comments in emails...all that matters is by who and how it was obtained.

 

There were Facebook accounts and Twitter accounts spewing as many untruths about Trump as there were spewing whatever about Clinton. Don't forget also the MSM was trying their best to counter the info coming out from the DNC and posting their own false information. Facebook and especially Twitter was so Pro Clinton that many thought that's why she'd win in a romp...they saw this over whelming internet presence and thought it would translate into a romp on election day.

 

Were those anti-Trump accounts controlled by a foreign govt?

 

Hardly equal:

Fake news could prove vexing in Mueller probe - POLITICO

 

"In the weeks and months before the election, fake anti-Clinton headlines such as “Wikileaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS” and “FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide” proliferated, as did pro-Trump headlines including “Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President.”

 

By a 5-to-1 margin, pro-Trump automated Twitter activity outnumbered similar accounts for Clinton in the days leading up to the November election, according to a post-election analysis by Philip Howard, a professor at the Oxford Internet Institute. Another study, by researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of Pennsylvania, found that the biggest cluster of Trump-minded bots was nearly four times larger than any mechanisms pumping up Clinton."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 70
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Were those anti-Trump accounts controlled by a foreign govt?

 

Hardly equal:

Fake news could prove vexing in Mueller probe - POLITICO

 

"In the weeks and months before the election, fake anti-Clinton headlines such as “Wikileaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS” and “FBI Agent Suspected in Hillary Email Leaks Found Dead in Apparent Murder-Suicide” proliferated, as did pro-Trump headlines including “Pope Francis Shocks World, Endorses Donald Trump for President.”

 

By a 5-to-1 margin, pro-Trump automated Twitter activity outnumbered similar accounts for Clinton in the days leading up to the November election, according to a post-election analysis by Philip Howard, a professor at the Oxford Internet Institute. Another study, by researchers from the University of Oxford and the University of Pennsylvania, found that the biggest cluster of Trump-minded bots was nearly four times larger than any mechanisms pumping up Clinton."

 

Were these by a foreign country or maybe by far right websites hoping to take Clinton down.

 

Clinton, President Obama, the Press, the DNC, you and everyone else thought she had the election won heading into those last few days...that could be why there was so much less activity from the Clinton side. After all they were so confident that they didn't even go to rust belt swing states (the ones that cost her the election ), I guess they were too busy buying fireworks.

 

Those crazy headlines were just that, crazy! No one believed the Pope was supporting Trump and even proven left leaning SNOPES said the "Clinton sells weapons to ISIS" was partially true in that she admitted ISIS would benefit from weapons being sold to Libya that she approved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some could argue that the Mexican President and Canadian Prime Minister also tried to influence the election.

 

If Russia had called the DNC and said we have hacked the RNC and here is thier dirt, do you think they would have welcomed it?

 

I still don't know what the Russians actually did that is considered meddling, after all just last summer around this time President Obama assured us there was no outside influences on our election process.

 

This is like getting caught stealing out of your mom's purse and younget punished, but you keep blaming all your troubles on your little brother for telling on you.

 

A member of our supreme court tried ti influence the election as well, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ill give liberals credit, they got people to basically ignore or forget what was exposed , and attack HOW it was exposed. Smart to distract from everything that was released.

 

We've had umpteen threads on the Wikileaks releases on here. And I'm afraid outside of the DNC's unsurprising favoritism towards Clinton, the rest of the 50,000 other emails were fairly banal, which is why they had to be transformed into nonsense conspiracy theories like "Pizzagate."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A member of our supreme court tried ti influence the election as well, right?

 

I know it's not really related to these events, but I recall with the Supreme Court did influence an election. 2000

 

Whether for better or not, correct interpretation or not; they did influence that one. :thumb:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We've had umpteen threads on the Wikileaks releases on here. And I'm afraid outside of the DNC's unsurprising favoritism towards Clinton, the rest of the 50,000 other emails were fairly banal, which is why they had to be transformed into nonsense conspiracy theories like "Pizzagate."

 

I thought they revealed quite a bit and displayed exactly why she was a terrible choice and would have been an awful president.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.