Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Clyde it's really not nitpicking. It's an actual definition. It's nitpicking in regards to this discussion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Anyone bothered by Mr Trump via Gov Pence doing this specifically for a company he has a financial interest in? Is this thing on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 The country's #1 hockey mom is not happy. Dropped the "crony capitalism " and "corruption" lines. Guess she's not going to be in the cabinet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share Posted December 3, 2016 It's nitpicking in regards to this discussion. I'll be honest in this specific situation you are trying to nitpick. You know there is a huge difference. On the other message I'm reaearching and I will let you know once I know actual facts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I'll be honest in this specific situation you are trying to nitpick. You know there is a huge difference. On the other message I'm reaearching and I will let you know once I know actual facts The little I've read: He has a six-figure investment (not huge by his standards but still legit) in the parent company. Apparently it's on something he filed. So we have him interceding on behalf of a company that he owns. So simple question - is that a problem? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share Posted December 3, 2016 The little I've read: He has a six-figure investment (not huge by his standards but still legit) in the parent company. Apparently it's on something he filed. So we have him interceding on behalf of a company that he owns. So simple question - is that a problem? As someone who deals in this world. I'm researching more. Does he own direct shares or is it in a fund. It's a big difference. I've seen to many journalist try to slam somone on this difference. Also is it in an account where someone else has discretionary power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 As someone who deals in this world. I'm researching more. Does he own direct shares or is it in a fund. It's a big difference. I've seen to many journalist try to slam somone on this difference. Also is it in an account where someone else has discretionary power. Interest income from a bond. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted December 3, 2016 Author Share Posted December 3, 2016 Interest income from a bond. That is completly different then. This move wasn't going to affect the company going out of business. The bond is a completed contract , only affected out of bankruptcy. Individual shares , a large number would be negative. So to answer your question , no that doesn't affect me at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Update: Transition team says the investment was sold in January. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Really nitpicking. Simple point. Carrier got hand picked to receive a financial gain. Call it what you wish. Since were nitpicking...thank Obama for the 535 million he left the taxpayers on the hook for. Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Since were nitpicking...thank Obama for the 535 million he left the taxpayers on the hook for. Solyndra Scandal | Full Coverage of Failed Solar Startup - The Washington Post How is this related ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 How is this related ? A company that was hand picked by a sitting president. Actually revieved tax payer money, claimed bankruptcy. Left tax payers paying more, is much worse than a company paying less in taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 A company that was hand picked by a sitting president. Actually revieved tax payer money, claimed bankruptcy. Left tax payers paying more, is much worse than a company paying less in taxes. Handpicked by which President? Request was made and approved before Jan 20, 2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hellcats Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 Will Trump ever do anything good in your eyes? What could he do short of to resign that you would think is good. Keep in mind the liberal left wants to be inclusive of everyones ideas. What say you Hellcats? I want him to do what he said he could do. He suckered your votes, so do the job. Land all the jobs: not half of the jobs. Prosecute the criminal. Build the Wall. If he doesn't do these things HE is a failure like him or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted December 3, 2016 Share Posted December 3, 2016 I want him to do what he said he could do. He suckered your votes, so do the job. Land all the jobs: not half of the jobs. Prosecute the criminal. Build the Wall. If he doesn't do these things HE is a failure like him or not. Now Ann Coulter is concerned about him. Already wondering about him being a "sell-out." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts