Riots in North Carolina over shooting

[Clyde]

Which must be why they arent making it public.

 

Not looking good for the officer

 

 

I'm not sure what to think. Deters waited a long time to release it. Wanted the investigation to be complete before releasing it.

[plantmanky]

Mrs Lynch commented how the rioting was getting in the way and was not acceptable.

 

Because shes credible.

[Clyde]

Because shes credible.

 

How is she not credible ?

[TexasRanger]

How is she not credible ?

 

I'm guessing he's referring to her tarmac meeting a couple months ago.

 

Just a guess Clyde.

[nkuclubbaseball19]

Not releasing the video is a bad move in my eyes. No matter what it shows.

 

If it shows the officer was justified, keeping it secret makes everyone think it looks bad for the cop, riots ensue.

 

If it shows the officer wasn't justified, it contradicts police statements early on, riots ensue.

 

It shows the officer was justified and you release it, it's possible things calm down.

[JDEaston]

Not releasing the video is a bad move in my eyes. No matter what it shows.

 

If it shows the officer was justified, keeping it secret makes everyone think it looks bad for the cop, riots ensue.

 

If it shows the officer wasn't justified, it contradicts police statements early on, riots ensue.

 

It shows the officer was justified and you release it, it's possible things calm down.

 

Why would they release it to the public before a grand jury even gets a chance to look at it?

[woodsrider]

If he was holding a gun and refused to drop it after being told too, I don't blame the officers for shooting him. I don't care if he was backing up or doing cartwheels. Just because he isn't pointing it at them means nothing. It takes less than a second to raise the gun and get a shot off.

[plantmanky]

Not releasing the video is a bad move in my eyes. No matter what it shows.

 

If it shows the officer was justified, keeping it secret makes everyone think it looks bad for the cop, riots ensue.

 

If it shows the officer wasn't justified, it contradicts police statements early on, riots ensue.

 

It shows the officer was justified and you release it, it's possible things calm down.

 

No it wont, those that are rioting are doing so because they want too, they are criminals nothing more, they need to be dealt with, we (society and law enforcement) are afraid to do what is necessary to keep peace.

[nkuclubbaseball19]

Why would they release it to the public before a grand jury even gets a chance to look at it?

 

Did I put a time frame on it? I did not. I was referring to the article that mentioned the police may never release the video.

[JDEaston]

Did I put a time frame on it? I did not. I was referring to the article that mentioned the police may never release the video.

 

They may not... But at the same time they didn't say they won't. So again, why not just let it play out and see what happens.

[TexasRanger]

Did I put a time frame on it? I did not. I was referring to the article that mentioned the police may never release the video.

 

TV law pundit mentioned you wouldn't release the video in the event there was trial. It could affect the witnesses ect ect.

 

That does make sense to me.

[00Rocket28]

This photo is on leoaffairs.com and claiming to have confirmed this was from the scene.

 

[plantmanky]

TV law pundit mentioned you wouldn't release the video in the event there was trial. It could affect the witnesses ect ect.

 

That does make sense to me.

 

If the witnesses havent seen the video, they tell you what happened. When they have seen the video, they tell you what they see in the video. Big difference.

[JDEaston]

This photo is on leoaffairs.com and claiming to have confirmed this was from the scene.

 

[ATTACH]58167[/ATTACH]

 

 

I know nothing about the website mentioned or if its credible but that looks like a revolver laying on the ground to me.

[00Rocket28]

I'm gonna take it with a grain of salt till I see it on tv