Frances Bavier Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Fastbreak and stickymitts, I just sent a PM to oldschoolwrestler, in which I told him that the reason I read most of these types of threads is because they reveal which members can take a position, then defend it with rational thought (and coherent statements). On the other hand, it also reveals those that can't... Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Fastbreak and stickymitts, I just sent a PM to oldschoolwrestler, in which I told him that the reason I read most of these types of threads is because they reveal which members can take a position, then defend it with rational thought (and coherent statements). On the other hand, it also reveals those that can't... Frances Where do I come in on your scale of rational thinking? :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Fastbreak and stickymitts, I just sent a PM to oldschoolwrestler, in which I told him that the reason I read most of these types of threads is because they reveal which members can take a position, then defend it with rational thought (and coherent statements). On the other hand, it also reveals those that can't... Frances Since I didn't receive a PM, I must be one of the irrational, incoherent of which you speak. :cry: :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Where do I come in on your scale of rational thinking? :lol: OOOOOOO Let ME! Let ME! :jump: :jump: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 OOOOOOO Let ME! Let ME! :jump: :jump: I wasn't talking to you. :fire: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastbreak Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Where do I come in on your scale of rational thinking? :lol: I already know the answer to that one... :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I wasn't talking to you. :fire: I've said it before.....when have I ever waited for you to give me permission? :devil: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I already know the answer to that one... :lol: Dang it...I'll suppress any thoughts of posting in threads of this nature in order to slow the dumbifying process. :irked: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastbreak Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Dang it...I'll suppress any thoughts of posting in threads of this nature in order of slowing the dumbying process. :irked: I was referring to my knowledge of where I come down on Frances' scale of rational/irrational posters, not you... :lol: That's why I don't need to ask. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 I was referring to my knowledge of where I come down on Frances' scale of rational/irrational posters, not you... :lol: That's why I don't need to ask. Oh, in that case. I'll patiently await the criticism. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Stickymitts - I never really started a "scale of rational thinking" - I just read posts in controversial threads to get a better grip on who can defend their positions, and who has to resort to "cause I believe it's right" or "my values are better than your values"... You may have hit on a great idea, though. Maybe we could start some system wherein we rate each member on his/her ability to support their positions (regardless of their stance on a given issue) with your "scale of rational thinking". We could rate the important posts on a scale of 1 to 10, and see where we all end up. Of course, you couldn't rate your own posts, and it would be on the honor system. Then again, it might be a little embarassing for those of us with a rating that is lower than the number of eyelets in a pair of penny loafers. Rockmom - We share the same side of many debates, but not all of them. Then again, I'd be worried if someone agreed with my views 100% of the time. One thing you do NOT lack is the ability to present your views in a clear manner, with solid reasoning intact. Thanks, Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Professor Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 That's probably true about Male and Manual, but the point is hardly moot. It's a huge advantage over 98 percent of the public schools in Kentucky. The rest of the state can't draw the best and brightest from a county the size of Jefferson and send back the ones you don't want. Very true. What does Jefferson County have....1/4 of the state's population, or a million people? That is a huge advantage. Many counties in my area are one high school counties. No one is turned away. It's the law. As a matter of fact, it's almost impossible to expell some of the really bad eggs, those that make it difficult to teach a class. I'd say at most private schools a trouble maker is out the door faster than he or she can ask "why, what have I done"? And to have the ability, if they so desire, to take the best and brightest and weed the rest out, that's a big advantage too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Stickymitts - I never really started a "scale of rational thinking" - I just read posts in controversial threads to get a better grip on who can defend their positions, and who has to resort to "cause I believe it's right" or "my values are better than your values"... You may have hit on a great idea, though. Maybe we could start some system wherein we rate each member on his/her ability to support their positions (regardless of their stance on a given issue) with your "scale of rational thinking". We could rate the important posts on a scale of 1 to 10, and see where we all end up. Of course, you couldn't rate your own posts, and it would be on the honor system. Then again, it might be a little embarassing for those of us with a rating that is lower than the number of eyelets in a pair of penny loafers. Rockmom - We share the same side of many debates, but not all of them. Then again, I'd be worried if someone agreed with my views 100% of the time. One thing you do NOT lack is the ability to present your views in a clear manner, with solid reasoning intact. Thanks, Frances I'll take that as low. :irked: BTW, the "scale of rational thinking" idea is opening a can of worms that I don't think any of us want to see. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fastbreak Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 You may have hit on a great idea, though. Maybe we could start some system wherein we rate each member on his/her ability to support their positions (regardless of their stance on a given issue) with your "scale of rational thinking". We could rate the important posts on a scale of 1 to 10, and see where we all end up. Of course, you couldn't rate your own posts, and it would be on the honor system. Would that be a public or a private forum? :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted September 20, 2005 Share Posted September 20, 2005 Would that be a public or a private forum? :lol: Well, we'd obviously have to have several threads to discuss it (taking every opportunity to berate and belittle anyone that disagrees with us). Maybe someone with a degree in jurisprudence can give us some direction ... Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts