Birdsfan Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Why? Because YOU wanted Lorenzen to play? No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. What could he have done better? Let's face facts here, Eli is the better quarterback. Once again, the QUARTERBACK did not lose this game. The defense did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
super Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. :thumb: :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youknowme Posted September 16, 2007 Author Share Posted September 16, 2007 Favre notches another record as Pack rips Giants http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=270916019 Favre now winningest QB in NFL history after Packers' win EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (ESPN.com news services) -- Brett Favre didn't need a rocket arm to become the winningest quarterback in NFL history on Sunday. His 17 years of football knowledge and a near-perfect second half against a bad defense were plenty. avre completed his first 14 second-half passes and threw three touchdown passes to rally the Green Bay Packers to a 35-13 victory over the New York Giants' porous defense. "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer John Elway. What meant more to Favre was the game ball his teammates handed him after the Packers got off to their first 2-0 start since 2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshs81 Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. Jerk idiot coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
malachicrunch Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Just saw Coughlin interview. It's going to be a long week for the G-men. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 Once again, why? Eli has played very well in the first two games of the season... If you don't think they regret that you are crazy. The Chargers got Rivers and Merriman for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 If you don't think they regret that you are crazy. The Chargers got Rivers and Merriman for him. I know the Giants don't regret it. Why dwell on a decision made years ago by a different GM? If you think they sit around thinking, "man why did we do that?" you are crazy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 I know the Giants don't regret it. Why dwell on a decision made years ago by a different GM? If you think they sit around thinking, "man why did we do that?" you are crazy. Right I am sure they don't regret that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldrambler Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 It's Favre. Didn't you see "There's Something About Mary"? :laugh: :laugh: :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldrambler Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Favre notches another record as Pack rips Giants http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=270916019 Favre now winningest QB in NFL history after Packers' win EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (ESPN.com news services) -- Brett Favre didn't need a rocket arm to become the winningest quarterback in NFL history on Sunday. His 17 years of football knowledge and a near-perfect second half against a bad defense were plenty. avre completed his first 14 second-half passes and threw three touchdown passes to rally the Green Bay Packers to a 35-13 victory over the New York Giants' porous defense. "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer John Elway. What meant more to Favre was the game ball his teammates handed him after the Packers got off to their first 2-0 start since 2001. :ylsuper: :ylsuper: :ylsuper: My favorite player in the NFL by far. Farve is way up there on my all time list of favorites as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stickymitts Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 Why? Because YOU wanted Lorenzen to play? It was not even close to being Eli's fault that the Giants lost. He played a good game. Eli gave the Giants the best chance to win, why not play him if he's okay to go? BTW, any updates from friends of JLO on how his injury is? Hope he's okay. High ankle sprain, feels ok... 'I'll be fine'... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 High ankle sprain, feels ok... 'I'll be fine'... Good, send my best wishes! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
youknowme Posted September 17, 2007 Author Share Posted September 17, 2007 A couple of boneheaded penalties in the red zone by Shockey & Toomer cost the Giants potential points. The Giants are giving up 40 points a game through 2 weeks...Does Strahan think his $4 million this season will be worth enduring 14 more games worth of this??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 A couple of boneheaded penalties in the red zone by Shockey & Toomer cost the Giants potential points. The Giants are giving up 40 points a game through 2 weeks...Does Strahan think his $4 million this season will be worth enduring 14 more games worth of this??? Your first comment is right on. Although the refs made a huge mistake IMO on the Shockey penalty. The way they said it was that since the Packers jumped offsides on the play where Shockey spiked it, the penalties off-set and they replay the down. Yet, if the Packers did not jump off sides, the play would have counted, the Giants would have gotten a first down and the penalty would have been assessed AFTER the first down. So the Giants were technically penalized more, because the Packers committed a penalty. That can't be right. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts