September 16, 200718 yr Why? Because YOU wanted Lorenzen to play? No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow.
September 16, 200718 yr No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. What could he have done better? Let's face facts here, Eli is the better quarterback. Once again, the QUARTERBACK did not lose this game. The defense did.
September 16, 200718 yr No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. :thumb: :thumb:
September 16, 200718 yr Author Favre notches another record as Pack rips Giants http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=270916019 Favre now winningest QB in NFL history after Packers' win EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (ESPN.com news services) -- Brett Favre didn't need a rocket arm to become the winningest quarterback in NFL history on Sunday. His 17 years of football knowledge and a near-perfect second half against a bad defense were plenty. avre completed his first 14 second-half passes and threw three touchdown passes to rally the Green Bay Packers to a 35-13 victory over the New York Giants' porous defense. "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer John Elway. What meant more to Favre was the game ball his teammates handed him after the Packers got off to their first 2-0 start since 2001.
September 16, 200718 yr No, because, geven a chance, he might just have done a better job than Peyton's Shadow. Jerk idiot coach.
September 16, 200718 yr Once again, why? Eli has played very well in the first two games of the season... If you don't think they regret that you are crazy. The Chargers got Rivers and Merriman for him.
September 17, 200718 yr If you don't think they regret that you are crazy. The Chargers got Rivers and Merriman for him. I know the Giants don't regret it. Why dwell on a decision made years ago by a different GM? If you think they sit around thinking, "man why did we do that?" you are crazy.
September 17, 200718 yr I know the Giants don't regret it. Why dwell on a decision made years ago by a different GM? If you think they sit around thinking, "man why did we do that?" you are crazy. Right I am sure they don't regret that.
September 17, 200718 yr It's Favre. Didn't you see "There's Something About Mary"? :laugh: :laugh: :thumb:
September 17, 200718 yr Favre notches another record as Pack rips Giants http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/recap?gameId=270916019 Favre now winningest QB in NFL history after Packers' win EAST RUTHERFORD, N.J. (ESPN.com news services) -- Brett Favre didn't need a rocket arm to become the winningest quarterback in NFL history on Sunday. His 17 years of football knowledge and a near-perfect second half against a bad defense were plenty. avre completed his first 14 second-half passes and threw three touchdown passes to rally the Green Bay Packers to a 35-13 victory over the New York Giants' porous defense. "Maybe someday down the road it will mean a lot," a typically humble Favre said after the 149th win of his career, moving past Hall of Famer John Elway. What meant more to Favre was the game ball his teammates handed him after the Packers got off to their first 2-0 start since 2001. :ylsuper: :ylsuper: :ylsuper: My favorite player in the NFL by far. Farve is way up there on my all time list of favorites as well.
September 17, 200718 yr Why? Because YOU wanted Lorenzen to play? It was not even close to being Eli's fault that the Giants lost. He played a good game. Eli gave the Giants the best chance to win, why not play him if he's okay to go? BTW, any updates from friends of JLO on how his injury is? Hope he's okay. High ankle sprain, feels ok... 'I'll be fine'...
September 17, 200718 yr Author A couple of boneheaded penalties in the red zone by Shockey & Toomer cost the Giants potential points. The Giants are giving up 40 points a game through 2 weeks...Does Strahan think his $4 million this season will be worth enduring 14 more games worth of this???
September 17, 200718 yr A couple of boneheaded penalties in the red zone by Shockey & Toomer cost the Giants potential points. The Giants are giving up 40 points a game through 2 weeks...Does Strahan think his $4 million this season will be worth enduring 14 more games worth of this??? Your first comment is right on. Although the refs made a huge mistake IMO on the Shockey penalty. The way they said it was that since the Packers jumped offsides on the play where Shockey spiked it, the penalties off-set and they replay the down. Yet, if the Packers did not jump off sides, the play would have counted, the Giants would have gotten a first down and the penalty would have been assessed AFTER the first down. So the Giants were technically penalized more, because the Packers committed a penalty. That can't be right. :lol:
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.