4chs Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 I keep hearing that Paul sucked at jury management. Wasn't Josh the one who banged pans in the face of 3 of the people who voted for him? I'm so confused. I believe they held Paul accountable for Josh doing that and their votes kind of verify it. I knew that Josh had won as soon as she said that Mark had voted for him, and so did Paul. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Paul probably would have won if he'd have made his alliance a bit bigger. If he had included Mark/Elena or Alex/Jason in his alliance with Christmas/Josh I think he would have won. He would have still made the finals in all likelihood and could have just let Josh/Christmas and the other couple go after each other at the end and they would have been more upset with each other than at him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Irish Cat Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 I thought Paul did terrible in answering the Jury questions. At that point they've compared notes, it's time to own up to what you did to get them out. I have no idea whether or not this is true, but the rumors I've seen on Twitter predicted the jury votes, however, it's been suggested that the votes for Josh were not so much bitter votes against Paul, but were cast to spite Raven and Matt. Apparently living in the jury house with those two has been unbearable. If you notice the only people who voted for Josh were the ones that had to live in the jury house with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jumper_Dad Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 I thought Paul did terrible in answering the Jury questions. At that point they've compared notes, it's time to own up to what you did to get them out. I have no idea whether or not this is true, but the rumors I've seen on Twitter predicted the jury votes, however, it's been suggested that the votes for Josh were not so much bitter votes against Paul, but were cast to spite Raven and Matt. Apparently living in the jury house with those two has been unbearable. If you notice the only people who voted for Josh were the ones that had to live in the jury house with them. I could see that, Raven is delusional and Matt is possibly the player that did the least of any player that I've ever seen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Would Christmas have beaten Josh or Paul if she was in the finals? No. It would have been a landslide for either Paul or Josh had she been in the final two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Sebastian Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 I keep hearing that Paul sucked at jury management. Wasn't Josh the one who banged pans in the face of 3 of the people who voted for him? I'm so confused. Yes, but it was Paul pushing him to do that and everybody realized it. When a dog bites somebody are you mad at the dog or the owner who trained him to do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Yes, but it was Paul pushing him to do that and everybody realized it. When a dog bites somebody are you mad at the dog or the owner who trained him to do it? So you're saying Josh wasn't capable of thinking for himself? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Sebastian Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 So you're saying Josh wasn't capable of thinking for himself? Capable of it? Of course. He is an adult of at least moderate intelligence. Willing to? Absolutely not. He like so many others put complete trust in Paul and did as he said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 Capable of it? Of course. He is an adult of at least moderate intelligence. Willing to? Absolutely not. He like so many others put complete trust in Paul and did as he said. So why would anyone with a brain blame anyone other than the person who carried out the actions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted September 21, 2017 Share Posted September 21, 2017 It seems jury voting has been increasingly bitter ever since Big Brother started going out and "recruiting" houseguests from people who are looking to get into showbiz or looking for their "big break" instead of auditioning fans of the show and normal everyday people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil Sebastian Posted September 21, 2017 Author Share Posted September 21, 2017 So why would anyone with a brain blame anyone other than the person who carried out the actions? This I can't answer. Never been in that environment but I'd imagine emotions can easily overtake logic in such a high stress environment. It seems jury voting has been increasingly bitter ever since Big Brother started going out and "recruiting" houseguests from people who are looking to get into showbiz or looking for their "big break" instead of auditioning fans of the show and normal everyday people. 3 of the 5 votes for Josh to win were long time fans of the show (Cody, Mark, Alex) so while that theory may or may not be true, last night's results don't support it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts