GrantNKY Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 He is. You and Grant continue to prove this. Grant thinks a guy that has NEVER WON is the second best player ever. If that's not the definition of overrated I don't know what is. Is Dan Marino not one of the top 5 greatest QB's of all time? If you want to keep using sports references. Is Dan Marino overrated too? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJAlltheWay24 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Survivor is not first and foremost a social game. It's multifaceted with no part weighing more than the other. Over time it has 100% morphed into a social/strategic game first and foremost. Anything else is all subpoints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 The social part plays the biggest role, according to BGP. All parts play a big role. But you have to be able to win the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJAlltheWay24 Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 The social part plays the biggest role, according to BGP. Look at the most recent winners and say thats wrong... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Parker Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Randy and Grant are making my case for me again and again. Russell is extremely overrated. Guy never won. There is no debating that... UK's 38-1 team didn't win the NCAA title. Does that mean they were overrated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 Is Dan Marino not one of the top 5 greatest QB's of all time? If you want to keep using sports references. Is Dan Marino overrated too? I honestly don't follow football at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 UK's 38-1 team didn't win the NCAA title. Does that mean they were overrated? If you are saying they are the second best team of all time it does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 It's not just the "bitter" part that corrupts the jury. Juries have been influenced in the past by a person's financial status, or what they might do with the money, etc. Again part of the game. Juries have also been influenced by other jurors making pleas for one contestant or another. Doesn't matter to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Parker Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Look at the most recent winners and say thats wrong... I'm not denying it's wrong. I'm saying it's a serious flaw of the game/show. Just tonight, Sarah says she wouldn't have voted for Brad if he'd taken Tai instead of her, simply out of anger at him. That's ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 UK's 38-1 team didn't win the NCAA title. Does that mean they were overrated? Also. That team didn't play 3 times and once not make the NCAA tournament. Bad analogy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Randy and Grant are making my case for me again and again. Russell is extremely overrated. Guy never won. There is no debating that... What part of he never won because it was a bitter jury is so hard to comprehend? He deserved to win. Russell Hantz is the '07 Patriots. Both would be viewed as the greatest ever in their respective professions if they would have won one game against a inferior opponent. Doesn't mean the inferior opponent is all of the sudden better, it just means Russell Hantz had a bitter jury and the David Tyree had stick-em on top of his helmet. It happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Parker Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 If you are saying they are the second best team of all time it does. You said Russell is overrated because he didn't win. By that logic, the 38-1 UK team is overrated too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 The social part plays the biggest role, according to BGP. I think it is, does and should. It's not a pure competition show, that's an aspect. But you go into it knowing that there are social aspects you have to take into account. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrantNKY Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 If you are saying they are the second best team of all time it does. 15 UK is the single greatest team in the history of college basketball. Not debatable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted May 25, 2017 Author Share Posted May 25, 2017 What part of he never won because it was a bitter jury is so hard to comprehend? He deserved to win. Russell Hantz is the '07 Patriots. Both would be viewed as the greatest ever in their respective professions if they would have won one game against a inferior opponent. Doesn't mean the inferior opponent is all of the sudden better, it just means Russell Hantz had a bitter jury and the David Tyree had stick-em on top of his helmet. It happens. He had three chances. Give it up. Dude can't win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts