lionfan13 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I heard on Hannity's radio show today that it was Hussein. Talk about bad Karma. I'm suprised no one has brought it up in the media until now. Maybe they have but I haven't seen it. Could it effect voters in a presidential run? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bugatti Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I heard on Hannity's radio show today that it was Hussein. Talk about bad Karma. I'm suprised no one has brought it up in the media until now. Maybe they have but I haven't seen it. Could it effect voters in a presidential run? Yes, Hussein is his middle name. Will his name effect some voters decision when casting a ballot? Sadly, yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habib Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I heard on Hannity's radio show today that it was Hussein. Talk about bad Karma. I'm suprised no one has brought it up in the media until now. Maybe they have but I haven't seen it. Could it effect voters in a presidential run? What does it matter? He didn't study the life of Sadaam Hussein and decide that is who he wanted to share a name with. On top of that, I seriously doubt anyone who would change their vote based on a Muslim name would already be voting for an African-American Democrat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionfan13 Posted December 8, 2006 Author Share Posted December 8, 2006 What does it matter? He didn't study the life of Sadaam Hussein and decide that is who he wanted to share a name with. On top of that, I seriously doubt anyone who would change their vote based on a Muslim name would already be voting for an African-American Democrat. I'm in agreement with bugatti on this. IMO it would effect voters. I'm not saying that's fair but probably the case. Would people voted for William "Hitler" Clinton or George "Jong-il" Bush? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ram2003 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I'm in agreement with bugatti on this. IMO it would effect voters. I'm not saying that's fair but probably the case. Would people voted for William "Hitler" Clinton or George "Jong-il" Bush? I'd vote for a George "Jong-il" in a heartbeat. Yet not George W... hmm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cshs81 Posted December 8, 2006 Share Posted December 8, 2006 I'm in agreement with bugatti on this. IMO it would effect voters. I'm not saying that's fair but probably the case. Would people voted for William "Hitler" Clinton or George "Jong-il" Bush? As Habib said, those voters would never get past "Barack." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 As Habib said, those voters would never get past "Barack." I'm guessing that many of those voters would never get past the picture of the rooster on the ballot ... Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SKINPIG Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 I'm guessing that many of those voters would never get past the picture of the rooster on the ballot ... Frances Could you get past the donkey? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHSDad Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 You combine Hussein with Obama (sounds like Osama) and he might as well be named Adolph Stalin in some peoples mind. If there was a GOP candidate running for office with a name like Barack's, and that was all I knew about the guy, I doubt that I would vote for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 Could you get past the donkey? Odd that you ask. The answer is an unqualified "YES". I can't remember ever voting a straight ticket, and that is covering over 30 years in the voting booth. My grandmother was a devout Republican, and took great pride in reminding me that it was my solemn duty to "get in there and pull that rooster's tail". By the time I voted in my second Presidential election, I realized that voting for the party (either party) was the very definition of "willful ignorance". Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted December 9, 2006 Share Posted December 9, 2006 You combine Hussein with Obama (sounds like Osama) and he might as well be named Adolph Stalin in some peoples mind. If there was a GOP candidate running for office with a name like Barack's, and that was all I knew about the guy, I doubt that I would vote for him. Ahhhhh - there's the difference, though, HHSDad. You would never consider going into the booth, with no more knowledge of the candidates than the spelling of the name on the ballot. Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CoachBuckett Posted December 11, 2006 Share Posted December 11, 2006 It is Barack! President will be his frst name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bandit29 Posted December 11, 2006 Share Posted December 11, 2006 I don't think it will matter. What will matter is his weak record in office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
H Posted December 11, 2006 Share Posted December 11, 2006 You combine Hussein with Obama (sounds like Osama) and he might as well be named Adolph Stalin in some peoples mind. If there was a GOP candidate running for office with a name like Barack's, and that was all I knew about the guy, I doubt that I would vote for him. I think you're right. I heard a story on NPR this morning about a political rally in Chicago where people were getting all excited about Obama's potential candidacy, and I thought, "these people are setting themselves up for a huge disappointment if they think a guy with a name like that has a chance of winning the Presidency." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted December 11, 2006 Share Posted December 11, 2006 I don't think it will matter. What will matter is his weak record in office. Slick marketing and the right politically savvy moves can overcome a weak record in the eyes of many, many uninformed and don't care voters. Moreso, they want someone to be excited about rather than convinced they have the seasoning to do the job. Barack vs. Hillary should be interesting. Hillary with Barack as VP or vice versa would be interesting and potentially very motivating to Democrats. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts