September 5, 201511 yr https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-accusers-are-running-out-of-ammunition/2015/09/01/ea43091e-50e6-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html
September 5, 201511 yr I watched the interview yesterday with Hil trying to put out the email fire. I thought she looked even more deceitful, but I'm surely biased. Either way, it shows that her handlers have acknowledged she needs to address it somehow, yet she still was horribly unconvincing when asked about it. I don't think there's any way she can ever convince the American people that she's got any truth in her.
September 5, 201511 yr I watched the interview yesterday with Hil trying to put out the email fire. I thought she looked even more deceitful, but I'm surely biased. Either way, it shows that her handlers have acknowledged she needs to address it somehow, yet she still was horribly unconvincing when asked about it. I don't think there's any way she can ever convince the American people that she's got any truth in her. Unfortunately I'm not sure that this even hits the "standards" meter any longer…for all sides.
September 5, 201511 yr Unfortunately I'm not sure that this even hits the "standards" meter any longer…for all sides. Probably right.
September 5, 201511 yr She released a heck of a lot more emails than Rice and Powell, oh that's right, they didn't turn over anything at all. And they still can't find anything on her Umm they did find hundreds of classified emails . Also you either don't understand the situation or are purposely distracting because there are different rules in place now than those past secretary of states.
September 5, 201511 yr https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/clintons-accusers-are-running-out-of-ammunition/2015/09/01/ea43091e-50e6-11e5-933e-7d06c647a395_story.html Lol Dana Milbank. They have found hundreds of emails that were classified. 3 different agencies have already stated they sent top secret emails that she didn't have the power to declassify , so her story of them not being marked is irrelevant. Her story is setup for someone else to take the fall. Someone close to her will claim she unmarked classified emails without Hillary's knowledge and bite the bullet. Someone is getting punished. My problem is its all irrelevant. She only had one email . One email. She had no other means of electronic communication. So Sportsguy and the rest of Clinton's supporters want us to believe her entire time in office she never received classified or top secret email her entire time in office ? Really? So with all her traveling as part of her job she had to wait to be in D.C. to get documents with ongoing situations. Not buying it.
September 5, 201511 yr I watched the interview yesterday with Hil trying to put out the email fire. I thought she looked even more deceitful, but I'm surely biased. Either way, it shows that her handlers have acknowledged she needs to address it somehow, yet she still was horribly unconvincing when asked about it. I don't think there's any way she can ever convince the American people that she's got any truth in her. Her apology to the American people was basically, "I am sorry that you are not smart enough to understand my email issue". Thanks Hillary... She is sooooo easy to dislike...just a phony criminal...the more people get to see her, the more they dislike her.
September 5, 201511 yr I like respect Sportsguy but I do find apologist for Clinton , like him funny. Hillary's entire tune on this subject has changed as the evidence continues to mount against her. But you want to keep posting articles that it's a witch hunt ? 1. Did she use a private server instead of a government server for electronic communication? The answer is Yes. 2. Is this a violation of the regulations and duties of her office ? The answer is yes. 3. Did she recieve classified and top secret emails on this server? The answer is yes. So the question isn't did she do something. Did she lie. Did she break the trust of the American people. No the question is how sever was her actions and what the punishment should be if any.
September 5, 201511 yr I like respect Sportsguy but I do find apologist for Clinton , like him funny. Hillary's entire tune on this subject has changed as the evidence continues to mount against her. But you want to keep posting articles that it's a witch hunt ? 1. Did she use a private server instead of a government server for electronic communication? The answer is Yes. 2. Is this a violation of the regulations and duties of her office ? The answer is yes. 3. Did she recieve classified and top secret emails on this server? The answer is yes. So the question isn't did she do something. Did she lie. Did she break the trust of the American people. No the question is how sever was her actions and what the punishment should be if any. I forgot the other major point. 4. Did she wipe the server clean before she handed it over ? The answer is yes. Please someone tell me why I should trust her ?
September 8, 201511 yr NYT: Clinton Emails Contained Top Secret Info on NK Nukes | Mediaite People still want to say they got nothing ?
September 8, 201511 yr Good point , there are a few apologist on here who say the story was hot air and " you got nothing" . Same party line voters who will pull the handle for her and point out every little pimple on the R candidates . While they ignore this . Sad .
September 8, 201511 yr NYT: Clinton Emails Contained Top Secret Info on NK Nukes | Mediaite People still want to say they got nothing ? How can the doofus at the State Dept say with a straight face that emails with information about North Korea's nuclear program are NOT top secret?? How can communication about any country's nuclear program NOT be top secret? The Clintons have to be paying this guy a lot of money to keep saying this non-sense to reporters in these press conferences. He just makes a fool out of himself.
September 8, 201511 yr How can the doofus at the State Dept say with a straight face that emails with information about North Korea's nuclear program are NOT top secret?? How can communication about any country's nuclear program NOT be top secret? The Clintons have to be paying this guy a lot of money to keep saying this non-sense to reporters in these press conferences. He just makes a fool out of himself. Fear-doesn't want to add to the body count.
September 9, 201511 yr Now she comes out after months of refusing to apologizing and apologizes tonight after the NY times articles comes out today. This is to funny. If she didn't do anything wrong why apologize ?
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.