plantmanky Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 Take a car and crash into a guardrail head on without a seat belt and then crash head on into a guardrail while riding a motorcycle without a helmet....Guarantee I know which one is hurt worse. Head on, both are more than likely dead. Car drivers impact with the windshield is likely enough to kill them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sweet16 Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 And how many things can your head hit in the vehicle when involved in a crash, with no helmet on, regardless of a seat belt being on? A lot less than a person riding a motorcycle without a helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvFan4life Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 Head on' date=' both are more than likely dead. Car drivers impact with the windshield is likely enough to kill them.[/quote']airbag would prevent that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plantmanky Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 airbag would prevent that. Not wearing a seat belt, doubtful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SvFan4life Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 Not wearing a seat belt, doubtful. More so than on a motorcycle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Plato Posted May 27, 2014 Author Share Posted May 27, 2014 Nanny laws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJAlltheWay24 Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I thought that not wearing a seat belt was considered a secondary offense, meaning that they can't just pull you over for it and that you have to have done something else (e.g. speeding, running a light) and then they top you off with a seat belt violation charge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
halfback20 Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I thought that not wearing a seat belt was considered a secondary offense, meaning that they can't just pull you over for it and that you have to have done something else (e.g. speeding, running a light) and then they top you off with a seat belt violation charge. You are incorrect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigVMan23 Posted May 27, 2014 Share Posted May 27, 2014 I thought that not wearing a seat belt was considered a secondary offense, meaning that they can't just pull you over for it and that you have to have done something else (e.g. speeding, running a light) and then they top you off with a seat belt violation charge. Been "primary" for a while now in KY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts