IMOM Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Instead of LSU coming into Rupp Arena Tuesday night it was Louisville. Would the result be any different than it was in December? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I think it's safe to say UL has more players playing at a consistently high level right now. I don't see much of a talent gap either way... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hangman Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I think the result would be Kentucky getting a W either way... They need it right now very very bad, or the wheels would fall completely off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I say the Cards would take it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mobaar Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Based off the last few games? The Cards take it easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fieldhousekrayzie21 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Easy? Think about it. The cats played two bad road games after their big showdown with the best team in the nation (when they lost by only 3). UK would be playing at home and Rupp would be rocking as much as it did when Florida came to town. UK would win by 10+. Pitt and Marquette are extremely overrated and would be mediocre teams in the SEC. They are good wins for Louisville, but they are no Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoondockSaint Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Easy? Think about it. The cats played two bad road games after their big showdown with the best team in the nation (when they lost by only 3). UK would be playing at home and Rupp would be rocking as much as it did when Florida came to town. UK would win by 10+. Pitt and Marquette are extremely overrated and would be mediocre teams in the SEC. They are good wins for Louisville, but they are no Florida. The best team in the nation that just got dominated. How are Pitt and Marquette "extremely overrated". Have you seen either of them play more than once or twice this year? They would hold their own just fine in a "mediocre" SEC. 10+ is saying the cats would win easily, I can't see any logical reasoning behind that one... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
02Ram54 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 Instead of LSU coming into Rupp Arena Tuesday night it was Louisville. Would the result be any different than it was in December?If you want to compare it to the game in December, put it in Freedom Hall. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fieldhousekrayzie21 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 The best team in the nation that just got dominated. How are Pitt and Marquette "extremely overrated". Have you seen either of them play more than once or twice this year? They would hold their own just fine in a "mediocre" SEC. 10+ is saying the cats would win easily, I can't see any logical reasoning behind that one... I just explained the logical reasoning. We'll see how good the Big East is come tournament time, when they have no more than 2 teams in the Sweet 16, if that. The SEC will have at least 3. Florida is the best team in the Nation and will prove that again come tournament time. I've seen pleanty of Big East games. You obviously haven't watch the SEC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I just explained the logical reasoning. We'll see how good the Big East is come tournament time, when they have no more than 2 teams in the Sweet 16, if that. The SEC will have at least 3. Florida is the best team in the Nation and will prove that again come tournament time. I've seen pleanty of Big East games. You obviously haven't watch the SEC. Like last year when the Big East had 4 Sweet 16 teams to the 2 from the SEC... :walk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoondockSaint Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I just explained the logical reasoning. We'll see how good the Big East is come tournament time, when they have no more than 2 teams in the Sweet 16, if that. The SEC will have at least 3. Florida is the best team in the Nation and will prove that again come tournament time. I've seen pleanty of Big East games. You obviously haven't watch the SEC. Trust me, I've seen plenty of SEC games, and I didn't see any logic in that post. You presume to know a lot about things that are merely opinion at this point. I'll remember your statements come March. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Booge Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 ^^Expand your superior knowledge of the Sweet 16 to the Elite 8, Final Four, and National Champion...:walk: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 ^^Expand your superior knowledge of the Sweet 16 to the Elite 8, Final Four, and National Champion...:walk: I'm just working with the level of proof he provided... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fieldhousekrayzie21 Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I want it to be remembered so you can know I was right. There is logic behind it. UK came within 3 points of FLORIDA. Louisville would get beat by 15+ by Florida. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted February 19, 2007 Share Posted February 19, 2007 I want it to be remembered so you can know I was right. There is logic behind it. UK came within 3 points of FLORIDA. Louisville would get beat by 15+ by Florida. Marge is on the phone. Bart was bad at school and Lisa took the fall... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts