...start singing the praises of armed guards in schools (after ridiculing the NRA pres. for proposing it) now that their lord and saviour is going to propose paying for it?

 

Sent from my Samsung Stratosphere using Forum Runner

...start singing the praises of armed guards in schools (after ridiculing the NRA pres. for proposing it) now that their lord and saviour is going to propose paying for it?

 

Sent from my Samsung Stratosphere using Forum Runner

 

If you are going to be 100% condescending and full of ridicule for those that dare to disagree with you the least you can do it spell correctly.

 

"Lefties"

...start singing the praises of armed guards in schools (after ridiculing the NRA pres. for proposing it) now that their lord and saviour is going to propose paying for it?

 

Sent from my Samsung Stratosphere using Forum Runner

 

Despite the spelling error that Clyde wanted to bring up, I would say it will be a very short amount of time.

Back to the original question, yes it will now be praised with very little dissension from the left.

What are we going to arm them with?

I will speak as you all consider me a "lefty". Still 100% opposed to it in general.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner

I will speak as you all consider me a "lefty". Still 100% opposed to it in general.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner

You say "in general" is there a condition where you would be OK with having police officers in schools?

I will speak as you all consider me a "lefty". Still 100% opposed to it in general.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner

Are you opposed to it at the school Obamas kids attend ?

Are you opposed to it at the school Obamas kids attend ?

 

Cammando, don't embarrass yourself like the NRA did with their ad.

Not at all embarrassed... Simple question. Requires a yes/no answer. Even you should be able to understand that.

Not at all embarrassed... Simple question. Requires a yes/no answer. Even you should be able to understand that.

 

The President's child should always be protected. Hardly news. Has nothing to do with the debate at hand.

 

This ad is flat out embarrassing and hurts legit gun owners.

 

http://www.nrastandandfight.com/

The President's child should always be protected. Hardly news. Has nothing to do with the debate at hand.

 

This ad is flat out embarrassing and hurts legit gun owners.

 

NRA Stand and Fight

 

How is that the least bit embarrassing. Every student deserves the same feeling of security when they attend school. Armed and trained professional greatly heighten security, just ask the Secret Service.

I will speak as you all consider me a "lefty". Still 100% opposed to it in general.

 

Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner

 

Why?

What are we going to arm them with?

 

I advise against arming them with good intentions. Those don't seem to work against armed criminals.

How is that the least bit embarrassing. Every student deserves the same feeling of security when they attend school. Armed and trained professional greatly heighten security, just ask the Secret Service.

 

It's as embarrassing as people crying about the President (any President) putting their child in a private school while advocating public education. It's as embarrassing as people crying about a President (any President) taking a vacation or being away fromt he WH.

 

The President's life is completely different from every other Schmo. Most people get that and accept it. Some, NRA, try to play to the "Yeah, why is that guy any different than me" crowd. Sad.