Larry Warner Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I believed he was assigned Secret Service after the DNC in 2008. Maybe even before then. It was wise to do so. And for the record, I understand and accept that the POTUS and his family should have highly skilled armed protection and mine shouldn't. Do you really believe he didn't have armed protection much earlier in his career? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Do you really believe he didn't have armed protection much earlier in his career? Never thought about it. He may have. Who cares? If he can afford it go for it. If I could afford it or have the taxpayers pay for it I'd have it to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Warner Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Never thought about it. He may have. Who cares? If he can afford it go for it. If I could afford it or have the taxpayers pay for it I'd have it to. I agree, but he should't be hindering the ability of others to provide themselves the same protection. That is the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG BLACK JACK Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I don't need armed guards. Last time I checked, people weren't constantly wishing me dead, and talking about how America would been a better place without me. Unless Dragonfire is plotting something behind my back back home. :scared: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PurplePride92 Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I agree, but he should't be hindering the ability of others to provide themselves the same protection. That is the point. I'm against gun control but I don't see him as being hypocritical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry Warner Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I'm against gun control but I don't see him as being hypocritical. Then we disagree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 I don't need armed guards. Last time I checked' date=' people weren't constantly wishing me dead, and talking about how America would been a better place without me. Unless Dragonfire is plotting something behind my back back home. :scared:[/quote'] Well, I didn't used to think people wanted me dead....then BGP gained a political forum, and I got "outted" as a "liberal" in Kentucky. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Do you really believe he didn't have armed protection much earlier in his career? If he's like most other politicians, he probably bought into that idea a long time ago. You hear stories all the time of relatively unknown people (quasi-famous politicians, sports figures, etc.) running around with a security detail not because they actually need it, but because they like the way it makes them feel more important than they really are. Y'know, kind of like college football coaches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlbdonn Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 No, but if I was wealthy enough I would be able to provide training and weapons to produce a security force comprable to the President's, not including the military. However, that would be impossible if the right to own those weapons were taken away. Why should't a citizen with the available resources be allowed to protect themselves and their families in a comprable manor?You probably would be wealthy enough if you hadn't spent so much of it on those guns . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dlbdonn Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 One thing that the President didn't propose . Liability Insurance . Every gun owner should have a liability insurance policy for every gun that they own .We have to do it for automobiles l see no reason why gun owners shouldn't have to do the same . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodsrider Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 One thing that the President didn't propose . Liability Insurance . Every gun owner should have a liability insurance policy for every gun that they own .We have to do it for automobiles l see no reason why gun owners shouldn't have to do the same . Because it's stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Because it's stupid. Why? Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodsrider Posted January 16, 2013 Share Posted January 16, 2013 Why? Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner Seriously? I need to explain why forcing me to buy a liability policy for every fun I own is stupid? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockmom Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Seriously? I need to explain why forcing me to buy a liability policy for every fun I own is stupid? Yes. Seriously. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Forum Runner Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIG BLACK JACK Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 This is completely off topic, but why is there a Trinity High School ad on this page?! Errr. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts