All Tell Posted April 16, 2016 Share Posted April 16, 2016 He wants to raise every one else's taxes yet only paid at a 13% effective rate. :sssh: According to a bit of Googling he and his wife made enough to be in the 28% bracket yet he found enough deductions and loopholes to cut his effective rate in half. Hypocrisy any way you slice it. A good Socialist like him should be happy to give the government more. LINK Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Run To State Posted April 17, 2016 Share Posted April 17, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ggclfan Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 HRC makes more in one speech to Goldman Sachs than he makes in a year. I find that hilarious. I find it interesting that no audio tapes have come out on any of her speeches to the big banks. There is a reason why she is so afraid to release the transcripts. You would think TMZ would have come up with some audio or video by now... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 No one in the 28% tax bracket pays 28% of their income in taxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted April 18, 2016 Author Share Posted April 18, 2016 No one in the 28% tax bracket pays 28% of their income in taxes. But are they advocating across the board tax increases? I didn't say he did anything illegal, I said he did something hypocritical by reducing his tax burden while trying to increase everyone elses. I've said it before but it bears repeating, it's my belief that ANYONE who thinks there should be any tax increases is a hypocrite if they do anything (legal or otherwise) to reduce their own tax liability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4chs Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 But are they advocating across the board tax increases? I didn't say he did anything illegal, I said he did something hypocritical by reducing his tax burden while trying to increase everyone elses. I've said it before but it bears repeating, it's my belief that ANYONE who thinks there should be any tax increases is a hypocrite if they do anything (legal or otherwise) to reduce their own tax liability. No offense, but your theory is seriously flawed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted April 18, 2016 Author Share Posted April 18, 2016 No offense, but your theory is seriously flawed. Maybe, maybe not. Would you care to explain why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jericho Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Another reason to vote anyone but a politician, I mean crook. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jpa2825 Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Maybe, maybe not. Would you care to explain why? You are asking for unilateral disarmament. It is perfectly reasonable to seek a change in the system while operating under the system that is currently in place. Same as George Clooney's point on $ in politics. Basically, he said he wishes he didn't have to raise $ and is trying to elect people who agree with him on that point. However, if he simply didn't raise $ because he opposes the system, that would leave all the influence to the Koch brothers and others he disagrees with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Friction Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 I'm still feeling the Bern !!!! BERNIE 2016 !!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plantmanky Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 Considering 45% of people pay nothing, sounds about right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Science Friction Posted April 18, 2016 Share Posted April 18, 2016 I love that old curmudgeon !!!!! President Sanders.... Damn that sounds good !!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All In Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 Free college and health insurance for everyone, that's what everyone wants and wants to hear. He's got my vote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted April 19, 2016 Author Share Posted April 19, 2016 You are asking for unilateral disarmament. It is perfectly reasonable to seek a change in the system while operating under the system that is currently in place. Same as George Clooney's point on $ in politics. Basically, he said he wishes he didn't have to raise $ and is trying to elect people who agree with him on that point. However, if he simply didn't raise $ because he opposes the system, that would leave all the influence to the Koch brothers and others he disagrees with. Sorry. it's hypocritical however you try to paint it. If he, or any politician believes that people should pay more in taxes then he/she should lead by example. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigVMan23 Posted April 19, 2016 Share Posted April 19, 2016 You are asking for unilateral disarmament. It is perfectly reasonable to seek a change in the system while operating under the system that is currently in place. Same as George Clooney's point on $ in politics. Basically, he said he wishes he didn't have to raise $ and is trying to elect people who agree with him on that point. However, if he simply didn't raise $ because he opposes the system, that would leave all the influence to the Koch brothers and others he disagrees with. I would agree with you if it was a FORCED system. Bernie wasn't FORCED to cut his effective tax rate from 28% to 13%. He could have paid MORE than the 28% bracket he is in if he wanted to...so why didn't he if he thinks everyone else should? So yes, @All Tell 's point has perfect merit. Bernie could have lived by the example he teaches/preaches and he chose not to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts