Bluegrasscard Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 I was watching more on this last night. Way more science coming, we could be close to understanding Dark Matter. High Times for sure! Seems like another discovery to plug the holes of a probably invalid gravity-dominate model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PepRock01 Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Seems like another discovery to plug the holes of a probably invalid gravity-dominate model. Really a fan of the electric model huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Really a fan of the electric model huh? It takes a lot of mystery out of the mysteries of the universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluegrasscard Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Really a fan of the electric model huh? It takes a lot of mystery out of the mysteries of the universe. Example: Astronomers bring the third dimension to a doomed star's outburst Also, the mystery of the solar wind acceleration has no answer in a gravity/nuclear sun driven model. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Seems like another discovery to plug the holes of a probably invalid gravity-dominate model. I was watching something the other night that said we don't understand 95% of what is going on in the Universe. And that is probably a conservative estimate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lawildcat Posted August 24, 2016 Share Posted August 24, 2016 Hell, I didn't understand 95% of what is going on in this thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coldweatherfan Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 They finally found dilithium crystals, which will now make warp travel possible. Is it dilithium crystals or a beryllium sphere that we need? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 Hell, I didn't understand 95% of what is going on in this thread! :clap: :laugh::laugh: You go girl!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Voice of Reason Posted August 25, 2016 Share Posted August 25, 2016 Let's see if this helps us. Here is a summary of the paper that details all this: Particle Physics Models for the 17 MeV Anomaly in Beryllium Nuclear Decays Jonathan L. Feng, Bartosz Fornal, Iftah Galon, Susan Gardner, Jordan Smolinsky, Tim M. P. Tait, Philip Tanedo (Submitted on 11 Aug 2016) The 6.8σ anomaly in excited 8Be nuclear decays via internal pair creation is fit well by a new particle interpretation. In a previous analysis, we showed that a 17 MeV protophobic gauge boson provides a particle physics explanation of the anomaly consistent with all existing constraints. Here we begin with a review of the physics of internal pair creation in 8Be decays and the characteristics of the observed anomaly. To develop its particle interpretation, we provide an effective operator analysis for excited 8Be decays to particles with a variety of spins and parities and show that these considerations exclude simple models with scalar or pseudoscalar particles. We discuss the required couplings for a gauge boson to give the observed signal, highlighting the significant dependence on the precise mass of the boson and isospin mixing and breaking effects. We present anomaly-free extensions of the Standard Model that contain protophobic gauge bosons with the desired couplings to explain the 8Be anomaly. In the first model, the new force carrier is a U(1)B gauge boson that kinetically mixes with the photon; in the second model, it is a U(1)(B-L) gauge boson with a similar kinetic mixing. In both cases, the models predict relatively large charged lepton couplings ~ 0.001 that can resolve the discrepancy in the muon anomalous magnetic moment and are amenable to many experimental probes. The models also contain vectorlike leptons at the weak scale that may be accessible to near future LHC searches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted September 2, 2016 Share Posted September 2, 2016 Is it dilithium crystals or a beryllium sphere that we need? And a tune-up of the Heisenberg Compensators. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts