IAmAFan Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 You guys are funny. Kerr and Paxson were undersized, slow by NBA standards and both had very good careers. It's like we are ignoring his improvement while at Duke on D and handling the rock. This isn't 18 year old JJ... I think JJ still has time to have a solid NBA career. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 I think JJ still has time to have a solid NBA career. So do I. That's my point... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IAmAFan Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 So do I. That's my point... Got ya. Like someone said, he's naturally going to play the two. He isn't a good enough ball handler (at this point) to play the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gunner11 Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 So do I. That's my point... I don't think you read the rest of my statement either. I think JJ could be very effective on a team that has a strong, tall, physical PG. I do not think that is the Orlando Magic. The two guys you mentioned, Kerr and Paxson, had probably the best guard of all time as their opposite who made not only them better but everyone else on the floor better. It is clear the big reason that he is not playing right now is not his offensive ability, but his defensive ability. Why else would Arroyo and Bogans be getting minutes ahead of him??? What does surprise me is that Diener is still managing to see the floor more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T-CAT4LIFE Posted January 21, 2007 Share Posted January 21, 2007 This isn't 18 year old JJ... Your right. If it was, he would be at Duke, scoring a lot more buckets than he ever will in the league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatchMeIfYouCan Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 You guys are funny. Kerr and Paxson were undersized, slow by NBA standards and both had very good careers. It's like we are ignoring his improvement while at Duke on D and handling the rock. This isn't 18 year old JJ... Both also had some guy named Michael on their team.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEERFAN Posted January 22, 2007 Share Posted January 22, 2007 I think he could possibly be a good role player but nothing more. Possibly a double digit scorer but not a consistent starter for a contender. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CatchMeIfYouCan Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Redick 9 games played 13 minutes per game 5.3 points per game .417 FG % .467 3 Point % .846 FT % Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RockPride Posted January 23, 2007 Author Share Posted January 23, 2007 ^ he can still flat shoot it, he needs to get his stamina up, and injuries behind him...and he will be a contributor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. No Name Posted January 23, 2007 Share Posted January 23, 2007 Both also had some guy named Michael on their team.. Good Point....... :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts