formerkywrestler Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 If I remember right, there have to be 60 votes to bring him to the floor of the Senate for a confirmation vote. The R's don't have the 60 votes by themselves so the Dems have some control. The 60 votes are what is needed to prevent a filibuster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Anthony Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 If I remember right, there have to be 60 votes to bring him to the floor of the Senate for a confirmation vote. The R's don't have the 60 votes by themselves so the Dems have some control. Until McConnell and the R's change the rules/numbers of votes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jericho Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 I'm lost. Who used the nuclear option vote first. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 I'm lost. Who used the nuclear option vote first. Reid did in recent history on every position but the Supreme Court. But a 60 vote majority is not written into the constitution, it is a parliamentary rule. I would prefer to keep the filibuster rule but it will break in this climate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 And when the Dems are in power and using the same tactics all the people that are currently giddy will be complaining. And so the cycle goes... If not when, libs have outdone theirselves lately and harmed the moderate vote more than they realize. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted February 1, 2017 Author Share Posted February 1, 2017 I'm being lazy. Can the Ds hold this up in any way? I thought the Rs had enough votes already. If I were advising the Ds knowing full well that barring a bombshell (didn't pay taxes/diddled the nanny/etc) this gentlemen will be confirmed. So try to take the "high road" (by DC standards) and say "we believed that Mr Merrick should have been confirmed but due to the ugliness of politics it didn't happen. We've chosen not to take that route in the name of country first.... blah blah blah." It's the only small win they can get. "I'm not going to do to President Trump's nominee what the Republicans in the Senate did to President Obama's” - Dem. Senator Chris Coons Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJAlltheWay24 Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 Seems a few of my far left leaning friends are not happy with this choice because of his ruling on Hobby Lobby. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 "I'm not going to do to President Trump's nominee what the Republicans in the Senate did to President Obama's” - Dem. Senator Chris Coons Those days are over. Nobody gets ahead in the 24-hour news cycle by acting like an adult. The Republicans kicked and screamed for eight years as they used every trick in the book and now I'm supposed to believe the high road matters? Nah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 Those days are over. Nobody gets ahead in the 24-hour news cycle by acting like an adult. The Republicans kicked and screamed for eight years as they used every trick in the book and now I'm supposed to believe the high road matters? Nah. Let's not kid ourselves....It's been going on for a hell of a lot longer than 8 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 Let's not kid ourselves....It's been going on for a hell of a lot longer than 8 years. That's fair. It definitely seems like it's all been ramped up for the last two presidents. Maybe it's just heightened awareness. Maybe it's always been like this and we never noticed. I don't know who starts acting like this isn't a game first, but after the way the Republicans treated the Supreme Court last year, I wouldn't be inclined to let Mr. Trump coast to an easy victory. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
All Tell Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 If the Dems filibuster this nominee and McConnell decides not to nuke it then the Republicans should make them actually physically, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, filibuster. Make the Dems keep the Senate in session 24/7, make the Dem Senators from states Trump won that are up for re-election stand and go on the record for all to see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 That's fair. It definitely seems like it's all been ramped up for the last two presidents. Maybe it's just heightened awareness. Maybe it's always been like this and we never noticed. I don't know who starts acting like this isn't a game first, but after the way the Republicans treated the Supreme Court last year, I wouldn't be inclined to let Mr. Trump coast to an easy victory. Two words....Social media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerkywrestler Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 That's fair. It definitely seems like it's all been ramped up for the last two presidents. Maybe it's just heightened awareness. Maybe it's always been like this and we never noticed. I don't know who starts acting like this isn't a game first, but after the way the Republicans treated the Supreme Court last year, I wouldn't be inclined to let Mr. Trump coast to an easy victory. This is where we disagree. This doesn't change the makeup of the court. There is potential for a much bigger fight down-the-road. I'd try to negotiate or something first. But at the end of it all I feel Mr Gorsuch will be the next member of the SCOTUS. The question is, how much damage will be done getting him there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIPTON BASH Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 "I'm not going to do to President Trump's nominee what the Republicans in the Senate did to President Obama's” - Dem. Senator Chris Coons McConnell said last night he already has 6 Democrat votes before the hearing. We will see if he can get 8. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Getslow Posted February 1, 2017 Share Posted February 1, 2017 This is where we disagree. This doesn't change the makeup of the court. There is potential for a much bigger fight down-the-road. I'd try to negotiate or something first. But at the end of it all I feel Mr Gorsuch will be the next member of the SCOTUS. The question is, how much damage will be done getting him there? From a practical standpoint I agree with you. I don't even completely hate the appointment. Aside from my own opinion that originalism is a total fraud as a legal principle, he's at least going to be thoughtful, professional, and serious, which was honestly more than I expected from this president's appointments. I've seen some of his work already and I think the court will be fine with him on the bench. But the Republicans have been richly rewarded for obstinacy the last few years. I'm less confident that Democrats will be rewarded for pragmatism. In the end, the worst thing that can happen is for just enough Democrats to support the nomination while the rest carry out a campaign of meager resistance. It would give the president a victory while making the Democrats look weak, divided, and petulant. Schumer's first big test as leader will be to ensure the party puts up a united front, whatever that front may be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts