75center Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 In my estimation, Clinton's primary opportunity to swing the Court leftward is through the current vacancy. I assume Kennedy will be the prime candidate for retirement over the next 4-8 years, but he has his own liberal streak. So, why don't Republicans confirm Garland before Clinton has the opportunity to nominate a justice? My reading of Garland is that he's someone who studiously follows precedent and favors limited, narrow rulings over sweeping changes. Even if he isn't ideologically a conservative he seems like someone unlikely to rock the boat or break with precedent, thus making him more of a moderate/Kennedy-esque justice than who Clinton or Democrats might prefer (I'm surprised there hasn't been more criticism of Obama's decision from the left). It just seems like a tremendous risk for Republicans, especially with Trump on the top of the ticket. Because they've become adept at cutting off their nose to spite their face. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
plantmanky Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 So the ATF is getting information that the NSA already has, and were concerned about it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldgrappler Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 In my estimation, Clinton's primary opportunity to swing the Court leftward is through the current vacancy. I assume Kennedy will be the prime candidate for retirement over the next 4-8 years, but he has his own liberal streak. So, why don't Republicans confirm Garland before Clinton has the opportunity to nominate a justice? My reading of Garland is that he's someone who studiously follows precedent and favors limited, narrow rulings over sweeping changes. Even if he isn't ideologically a conservative he seems like someone unlikely to rock the boat or break with precedent, thus making him more of a moderate/Kennedy-esque justice than who Clinton or Democrats might prefer (I'm surprised there hasn't been more criticism of Obama's decision from the left). It just seems like a tremendous risk for Republicans, especially with Trump on the top of the ticket. There is logic to what you propose. In answer to the bolded: the best laid plans of mice and men... The Republicans saw that HRC was the easiest opponent to defeat in decades but Trump has laid a "raisin" or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted August 5, 2016 Share Posted August 5, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fear the Nation Posted August 6, 2016 Share Posted August 6, 2016 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts