March 13, 201214 yr He was hypocritical in all that he said. Had a double standard for the four men. And his job is NOT to judge a man's heart, which is what he was doing. My father-in-law, a Baptist preacher and former professor at Southern Seminary was disgusted (that may be too strong, but maybe not) by the comments and the light it shed on other Christians. Knowing your Father-in-Law I would say he was probably beyond disgusted by Franklin's statements. That might actually have been a tame word. :lol:
March 13, 201214 yr 1st Amendment right to say what he believes or thinks, I can't believe it would be a problem with some on here since they fight for 1st Amendment all of the time. Just because someone has the right to say something does not mean it was not a stupid thing to say. I never have understood how people cannot understand that the first amendment only allows to to speak freely, it does not protect you from the public mockery you may receive from saying something stupid such as in this case.
March 13, 201214 yr Author Knowing your Father-in-Law I would say he was probably beyond disgusted by Franklin's statements. That might actually have been a tame word. :lol: I have only heard him use salty language once or twice - that might have been one of them.
March 14, 201214 yr I have only heard him use salty language once or twice - that might have been one of them. When it's Hebrew he really means business. LOL.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.