Couple of things:

1. I told y'a so...I maintained all last year and thoughout this year that Highlands atrocious defense had been masked by a great offense...and that this Highlands offense was far from great. Hughlands literally cannot play D against teams with a pulse.

2. A lot of people said Highlands got better as the season went along? Do you really feel that way or did they just start playing really bad teams?[/QUOTE]

 

Most definetly improved as the year went on. Significantly. It was fun to watch even though it's pretty much an annual event.

Nice fake pass, handoff behind the back.

 

 

Other game photos here:

Great win for Pulaski Co, congrats!

I have no dog in the fight but there were a lot of people in the stands complaining about HHS coaching decisions. I don't know enough about the team to comment but that's what I heard .

 

I do believe the fake punt decision in the 3rd quarter was a bad idea.

 

It appeared it wasn't a called fake punt. The punter bobbled the ball then took off. Looked like he panicked, though there was no rush on him. He still had plenty of time to kick the ball.

It appeared it wasn't a called fake punt. The punter bobbled the ball then took off. Looked like he panicked, though there was no rush on him. He still had plenty of time to kick the ball.

 

If that's the case then my apologies to the coaching staff.

Nice fake pass, handoff behind the back.

 

[ATTACH=CONFIG]53480[/ATTACH]

 

Other game photos here:

Not the Annexation of Puerto Rico Jumper_Dad called earlier in the week but, the Statue of Liberty play worked out just fine. I'm still gonna need that video device, Jumper_Dad.

B

If that's the case then my apologies to the coaching staff.

 

Nah, no apologies needed for them. They really deserve all the criticism they are receiving. That was a really bad coached game. And all the pie comments, yeah just heard about that. Pretty much sums up the year. Embarrassing! "Someone" lost focus this week "boys"!

Pulaski comes back after trailing 28-14 in the first half to dominate the second half out scoring Highlands 27-3.

 

No way Dale allows 27 second half points.

No way Dale allows 27 second half points.

 

Sure he would. Pulaski earned those points. Question is, does Weinrich make adjustments on the D. He was Dales DC. So why weren't there adjustments yesterday? Is that Weinrichs call or some other Coach? If adjustments would have been made, we have no idea if Pulaski scores 27. But at least you have to do something right. Scheme, personnel, something! One thing, you don't wait till its too late to put Hebel in on d line and Doughtery back in. Crazy!

Not the Annexation of Puerto Rico Jumper_Dad called earlier in the week but, the Statue of Liberty play worked out just fine. I'm still gonna need that video device, Jumper_Dad.

PurplePride showed up last night and took it and any possible video that may or may not have been on it to Bowling Green.

B

 

Nah, no apologies needed for them. They really deserve all the criticism they are receiving. That was a really bad coached game. And all the pie comments, yeah just heard about that. Pretty much sums up the year. Embarrassing! "Someone" lost focus this week "boys"!

 

Is it possible that Pulaski was just the better team and coaching was what got Highlands up to begin with? But in the end the better team won?

 

I'd be willing to bet that Brian Wienrich knows more about coaching than anyone on here bashing the Coaching.

PurplePride showed up last night and took it and any possible video that may or may not have been on it to Bowling Green.

Men with black coats and sunglasses are headed that direction now. Did you give expressed written consent for that video to be used? There will be consequences and repercussions

Is it possible that Pulaski was just the better team and coaching was what got Highlands up to begin with? But in the end the better team won?

 

I'd be willing to bet that Brian Wienrich knows more about coaching than anyone on here bashing the Coaching.

 

Absolutely Pulaski just possibly may have been the better team. And yes, Weinrich knows a ton more than I do at coaching. This was a very winnable game for Highlands. I expressed my ipinion as to why "adjustments" we're not made. If adjustments were made yesterday in the 2nd half, on Highlands part, they didn't work now did they?

 

Just sayin!

This one game reminds me of the final HHS game from the 2013 season and the 2014 season, but for completely different reasons.

 

This 2015 Pulaski teams reminds me of the 2013 Collins team. About 6 or 7 very good players. Game changers. Team in a two-platoon system that allows these 6/7 players to be substituted in on the other side of the ball when needed. Jackson got several snaps at safety ( great wide out ). Helton ran the wildcat and made the crucial first down catch (LB). Mosely inserted at slot back or tight end (OLB). There were others but you get the point. Collins HS did the same thing in 2013 to end the Birds string of state championships.

 

I am reminded of 2014 as both that game and this game were a tale of two halves. I now know how the Owensboro fans felt after last years state game. Last years adjustments and second half domination by HHS, became this years signature for the Maroons.

 

I think the story on this Highlands team is in this post. The difference this year for Highlands was not that they were down as a team. I think where they were down for a Highlands team was on the top end. Highlands usually has those 3-5 absolute studs and the team builds around them. That is where this Highlands team falls below previous ones. The most outstanding player on this team was the kicker.

I think the story on this Highlands team is in this post. The difference this year for Highlands was not that they were down as a team. I think where they were down for a Highlands team was on the top end. Highlands usually has those 3-5 absolute studs and the team builds around them. That is where this Highlands team falls below previous ones. The most outstanding player on this team was the kicker.

 

Lets define top end because that could be a very good debate I am sure.