Cincyhoops Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Looking for some clarity on this. If an underclassmen transfers after participating in Varsity games, will the athlete be able to play JV at the new school while awaiting for the 1 year ineligible period to expire? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dawgs83 Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Yes. There may be a period where you have to sit while they are ruling on the case. Once the case has been ruled on and the player has to sit then they can play JV ball Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodland Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 That rule needs to go away. Let them play wherever they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KY Hoop Dirt Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Once the player enrolls at new school and has physical and papers on file he / she is good to play JV and practice with the team, just can't check into a varsity contest until cleared by the KHSAA. Rule was passed last fall (2016). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brcatz Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Once the player enrolls at new school and has physical and papers on file he / she is good to play JV and practice with the team, just can't check into a varsity contest until cleared by the KHSAA. Rule was passed last fall (2016). Even if they move to a new house within the new district? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodland Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Even if they move to a new house within the new district? If you move then you will be eligible Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Mitchell Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 If you move then you will be eligible Not necessarily. If the hearing officer rules finds that the transfer was "athletically motivated" under bylaw 6, section 3, then the "change of address" exemption under section 2 can be nullified. See the Dakota Euton case, among others. Honestly, the KHSAA has TREMENDOUS discretion under its bylaws to declare kids eligible or not eligible. Frequently, in my opinion, it abuses the discretion, one way or another, and court intervention is required. A massive overhaul and re-thinking of the standards is warranted if you ask me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoptown b-ball fan Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Not necessarily. If the hearing officer rules finds that the transfer was "athletically motivated" under bylaw 6, section 3, then the "change of address" exemption under section 2 can be nullified. See the Dakota Euton case, among others. Honestly, the KHSAA has TREMENDOUS discretion under its bylaws to declare kids eligible or not eligible. Frequently, in my opinion, it abuses the discretion, one way or another, and court intervention is required. A massive overhaul and re-thinking of the standards is warranted if you ask me. I agree. No consistency in how they apply the rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodland Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Not necessarily. If the hearing officer rules finds that the transfer was "athletically motivated" under bylaw 6, section 3, then the "change of address" exemption under section 2 can be nullified. See the Dakota Euton case, among others. Honestly, the KHSAA has TREMENDOUS discretion under its bylaws to declare kids eligible or not eligible. Frequently, in my opinion, it abuses the discretion, one way or another, and court intervention is required. A massive overhaul and re-thinking of the standards is warranted if you ask me. I totally agree the They need to throw the rule out. Let the kids go wherever they want. The kid should be allowed to go where it fits them best. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
groundattack Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Not necessarily. If the hearing officer rules finds that the transfer was "athletically motivated" under bylaw 6, section 3, then the "change of address" exemption under section 2 can be nullified. See the Dakota Euton case, among others. Honestly, the KHSAA has TREMENDOUS discretion under its bylaws to declare kids eligible or not eligible. Frequently, in my opinion, it abuses the discretion, one way or another, and court intervention is required. A massive overhaul and re-thinking of the standards is warranted if you ask me. If it is a legitimate change of address the KHSAA will rule in favor of the athlete. The problems with all of these rules are you have people out there trying to circumvent the rules and that leads to issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Mitchell Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 If it is a legitimate change of address the KHSAA will rule in favor of the athlete. The problems with all of these rules are you have people out there trying to circumvent the rules and that leads to issues. WHat was not "legitimate" about Dakota Euton's change of address? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theguru Posted February 7, 2018 Share Posted February 7, 2018 Some of you wear me out... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts