Diamond Dandy Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 Technically, it wouldn't be new management. It would be the return of "old management that helped lead to the first deficit/debt growth and let social programs grow amok." They both have their issues and their problems. And when we as voters stick to worrying more about the Democrats and the Republicans rather than the quality of the individual candidates, than we are part of the problem. IMO I'am voting for the party with values. I'am voting DEMOCRATIC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperB Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 Contrary to your opinion the economy is doing well....very well. And if you look at the factors that this president inherited (recession) and 9/11...what the economy is doing is remarkable. The tax cuts worked. Secondly, to say the war "was executed with bad tactics" is WRONG. Quit using Democrat talking points. The war was executed brilliantly. Actually many think it was the greatest war EVER executed. The rebuilding has been bad. We are there now trying to nation build. We are not fighting a war. The two are different. The reconstruction has been a failure not the war. :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
75center Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here. Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 I'am voting for the party with values. I'am voting DEMOCRATIC. With Bill Clinton as their unofficial leader, that is a loaded statement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Covercorner Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 With Bill Clinton as their unofficial leader, that is a loaded statement. Now he didn't define what type of values. Ones trash is anothers treasure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Now he didn't define what type of values. Ones trash is anothers treasure. LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush? Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GusMcRae Posted October 23, 2006 Author Share Posted October 23, 2006 :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here. Care to elaborate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush? Frances Considering the original comment was about the Democratic party being the party of values (I almost choked even typing that let alone saying it. ), it was about Mr. William Jefferson Clinton being the unofficial leader of the party of values. I found that ironically hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HHSDad Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Care to elaborate? I'm pretty sure that he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Considering the original comment was about the Democratic party being the party of values (I almost choked even typing that let alone saying it. ), it was about Mr. William Jefferson Clinton being the unofficial leader of the party of values. I found that ironically hilarious. LBBC - I understood who the statement was intended for. I was simply demonstrating that the statement "One man's trash is another man's treasure" cuts both ways. Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 LBBC - I understood who the statement was intended for. I was simply demonstrating that the statement "One man's trash is another man's treasure" cuts both ways. Frances I prefer to view about all of the DC politicians as trash especially those that espouse that they are the leaders of the parties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 I prefer to view about all of the DC politicians as trash. One would be hard pressed to argue with that point of view. Very hard pressed. Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Covercorner Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush? Frances Issac Newton once said: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Frances Bavier Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 Issac Newton once said: "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." Ah yes - that loveable Sir Isaac Newton. I guess this is the Western version of the yin and the yang. Frances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ladiesbballcoach Posted October 23, 2006 Share Posted October 23, 2006 So if Sir Isaac indicates that there is an equal and OPPOSITE reaction to everything and we know that William J was low on the moral/value scale, does that mean GW is the opposite and high on the moral/value scale??????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts