Technically, it wouldn't be new management. It would be the return of "old management that helped lead to the first deficit/debt growth and let social programs grow amok."

 

They both have their issues and their problems. And when we as voters stick to worrying more about the Democrats and the Republicans rather than the quality of the individual candidates, than we are part of the problem. IMO

 

I'am voting for the party with values. I'am voting DEMOCRATIC.

Contrary to your opinion the economy is doing well....very well. And if you look at the factors that this president inherited (recession) and 9/11...what the economy is doing is remarkable. The tax cuts worked.

 

Secondly, to say the war "was executed with bad tactics" is WRONG. Quit using Democrat talking points. The war was executed brilliantly. Actually many think it was the greatest war EVER executed. The rebuilding has been bad. We are there now trying to nation build. We are not fighting a war. The two are different. The reconstruction has been a failure not the war.

 

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here.

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here.

 

Why?

I'am voting for the party with values. I'am voting DEMOCRATIC.

With Bill Clinton as their unofficial leader, that is a loaded statement.

With Bill Clinton as their unofficial leader, that is a loaded statement.

Now he didn't define what type of values. Ones trash is anothers treasure.

Now he didn't define what type of values. Ones trash is anothers treasure.

LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush?

 

 

Frances

:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:

 

That is one of the bravest and most rediculous posts I've read on here.

 

Care to elaborate?

LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush?

 

 

Frances

Considering the original comment was about the Democratic party being the party of values (I almost choked even typing that let alone saying it. ), it was about Mr. William Jefferson Clinton being the unofficial leader of the party of values. I found that ironically hilarious.

Care to elaborate?

I'm pretty sure that he doesn't.

Considering the original comment was about the Democratic party being the party of values (I almost choked even typing that let alone saying it. ), it was about Mr. William Jefferson Clinton being the unofficial leader of the party of values. I found that ironically hilarious.

 

LBBC -

 

I understood who the statement was intended for.

 

I was simply demonstrating that the statement "One man's trash is another man's treasure" cuts both ways.

 

 

Frances

LBBC -

 

I understood who the statement was intended for.

 

I was simply demonstrating that the statement "One man's trash is another man's treasure" cuts both ways.

 

 

Frances

I prefer to view about all of the DC politicians as trash especially those that espouse that they are the leaders of the parties.

I prefer to view about all of the DC politicians as trash.

One would be hard pressed to argue with that point of view. Very hard pressed.

 

 

Frances

LOL - are we talking about Bill Clinton or George Bush?

 

 

Frances

Issac Newton once said:

 

"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."

Issac Newton once said:

 

"For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction."

 

Ah yes - that loveable Sir Isaac Newton.

 

I guess this is the Western version of the yin and the yang.

 

 

Frances

So if Sir Isaac indicates that there is an equal and OPPOSITE reaction to everything and we know that William J was low on the moral/value scale, does that mean GW is the opposite and high on the moral/value scale???????