Kinger4g Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 A lot of variables, but if talent is equalized, coaching would have a great impact on the outcome of games. Player development, scheming, and situational game management would be the difference given comparable Jimmy's and Joe's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bugatti Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 At some point numbers, size, and talent will prevail in the W/L column. But by in large, most high school kids are competing against other high school kids that will never sniff a college field. If you can tap into maximum effort and get out of a kid their highest athletic abilities, that team will generally prevail, or at least be the best version of themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thsrocks Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 I give the coach credit for conditioning, coaxing, teaching, caring, and encouraging before adding the play-calling and strategy that affects the outcome of the contest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hip-Hop Box Posted August 16, 2017 Share Posted August 16, 2017 It really depends on the situation. Some teams are really talented but, the coaching is suspect. You can always tell when a team is talented and when the coach is a good coach. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts