7 hours ago, TheConch said:

Am I crazy? Since when do you count from the oldest down to claim “youngest”…. He has 1 brother younger than him, he’s the second youngest. 

Private school mathematics...

22 minutes ago, FrankNicodemus said:

Private school mathematics...

I chalk to up to blind loyalty to Ruthsatz, and the need to jump in and correct anytime anyone says anything about the family. 

57 minutes ago, TheConch said:

I chalk to up to blind loyalty to Ruthsatz, and the need to jump in and correct anytime anyone says anything about the family. 

In life when people say things that aren’t true. Close supporters of that family feel inspired to correct things & you think they are the bad guys.
It happens all the time in life. I’m confused you act like this is something new. This community is small.

There was a remark on here about Joe Danneman by @Colonels_Wear_Blue The screenshot was sent to my friend in a text. 

Joe was contacted & verified in text that it was all made up. The extent of the in depth lying is sickening.
 

What was the reasoning to do that?

Well this escalated quickly.  

Don't forget Holmes State Champions as well in 2009. So 3 out of 5.

5 hours ago, Breds82 said:

Don't forget Holmes State Champions as well in 2009. So 3 out of 5.

Good catch. Ruthsatz won 2/5 State Championships in NKY History.

 

1981 SK

2009 Holmes

2014 CovCath*

2018 CovCath*

2021 Highlands

 

Scott will probably be inducted into another NKY HOF (9th region, NKAC, etc) if they exist, but CCH still has not shared any reason why he can't be inducted into CCH - despite 13 years of service as a teacher and coach.

OK, slow morning at work so I will take a stab at a theory I have had in my mind since this has blown up.

The Hall of Fame committee proceeds to select and approved the inclusion of Nick and Scott into the Hall of Fame.  Unfortunately, this committee for whatever reason didn't realize the backstory behind closed doors what happened in regards to Scott no longer being the basketball coach.  The "Leaders" as several people of called them then stepped in and kyboshed the inclusion into the Hall of Fame for Scott.  The "Leaders" made a calculated risk of the backlash of taking him off the slate of entries was going to be less damaging then having him inducted.  Here is the reason why in my opinion:  I have a gut feeling the "Leaders" didn't want to give Scott and/or Nick the ability to stand up there behind a podium and BLAST the administration and the school for how his tenure ended.  The "Leaders" didn't want mud thrown in there face in a Cov Cath Hall of Fame ceremony setting.  Guess what? Based on how the reaction has been by Nick on Facebook and all of their allies on here and elsewhere, I think the "Leaders" probably were right that was highly likely to happen if you allowed both Nick and/or Scott to stand up there during the ceremony.

Again, not picking sides here but that has been a theory in my mind for awhile now especially with the school being so quiet on this issue. 

I could be totally wrong, that's why its a theory.....

2 hours ago, FrankNicodemus said:

OK, slow morning at work so I will take a stab at a theory I have had in my mind since this has blown up.

The Hall of Fame committee proceeds to select and approved the inclusion of Nick and Scott into the Hall of Fame.  Unfortunately, this committee for whatever reason didn't realize the backstory behind closed doors what happened in regards to Scott no longer being the basketball coach.  The "Leaders" as several people of called them then stepped in and kyboshed the inclusion into the Hall of Fame for Scott.  The "Leaders" made a calculated risk of the backlash of taking him off the slate of entries was going to be less damaging then having him inducted.  Here is the reason why in my opinion:  I have a gut feeling the "Leaders" didn't want to give Scott and/or Nick the ability to stand up there behind a podium and BLAST the administration and the school for how his tenure ended.  The "Leaders" didn't want mud thrown in there face in a Cov Cath Hall of Fame ceremony setting.  Guess what? Based on how the reaction has been by Nick on Facebook and all of their allies on here and elsewhere, I think the "Leaders" probably were right that was highly likely to happen if you allowed both Nick and/or Scott to stand up there during the ceremony.

Again, not picking sides here but that has been a theory in my mind for awhile now especially with the school being so quiet on this issue. 

I could be totally wrong, that's why its a theory.....

Bad take. Of course, its all speculation and hypothetical for both/all of us.

Personally, my gut reaction when I saw the HOF induction was that this is a good way to mend the wound from the unique end to his tenure.

 

 

Nick posted this tonight and he has a pretty good point, CCH is still using Coach Ruthsatz as a marketing tool but he can't get in the HOF.  

20 minutes ago, theguru said:

Nick posted this tonight and he has a pretty good point, CCH is still using Coach Ruthsatz as a marketing tool but he can't get in the HOF.  

The question still remains:

Why would they publicly announce his induction, and privately rescind it? 

3 minutes ago, InItToWinIt said:

The question still remains:

Why would they publicly announce his induction, and privately rescind it? 

That is a question for the Bishop. 

Between this and the Cooper "drama" I can't keep up. You would definitely think, though, that CCH would try and cut ties with Ruthsatz after all this and not have the banner with his picture on it. 

12 hours ago, InItToWinIt said:

The question still remains:

Why would they publicly announce his induction, and privately rescind it? 

The thing that stinks about this whole situation is that we may NEVER know why this happened. 

5 minutes ago, AvidSportsJunkie856 said:

The thing that stinks about this whole situation is that we may NEVER know why this happened. 

Why do you think any of us are entitled to know? If you read Jessica Ruthsatz response, I would think that's all that is needed to be known. Unless we think she's not being truthful. Which I seriously doubt.  Why don't we give this a rest.