Habib Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Not saying this guy is right or wrong, but put predicting who wins which state is up there with Joe Lunardi predicting who makes the NCAA tournament pool. We can name 45 of them right now. In 2008 there were about 3 or 4 question marks in the electoral college map. To be fair he's not offering a prediction but a probability of a particular outcome. If you are dealt pocket aces in hold 'em poker your probability of winning is high, but that doesn't mean you're going to win the hand. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Parker Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Just started with ads. Haven't heard their reasoning. Maybe they see some sort of shift in internal polling. FiveThirtyEight has PA as 96% chance for the President. Pennsylvania is always labeled a toss up by the talking heads & it never goes Red. I know states like that occasionally surprise us (see Indiana in 2008), but I am more than confident that PA stays with the Dems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SSC Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 I was under the impression that Romney wasn't putting many resources in PA? Was I wrong or did something change? Romney's heading to Pennsylvania as GOP drops millions on ads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Randy Parker Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 Romney's heading to Pennsylvania as GOP drops millions on ads Thanks. :thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 According to an article I posted in another thread last week, those who are undecided come election time tend to break towards the challenger (when there is an incumbent running) at a clip of around 80%. When is the last time this pushed the challenge ahead of the POTUS? In 2004 Sen Kerry was down by 2.4% a week before the election. He lost by 2.4% . This "incumbent" rule was looked into in 2006. The results do not show it to be factual as a rule. Pollster.com - Political Surveys and Election Polls, Trends, Charts and Analysis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 When is the last time this pushed the challenge ahead of the POTUS? In 2004 Sen Kerry was down by 2.4% a week before the election. He lost by 2.4% . This "incumbent" rule was looked into in 2006. The results do not show it to be factual as a rule. Pollster.com - Political Surveys and Election Polls, Trends, Charts and Analysis The link I posted in the other thread had statistical data to support the claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 The link I posted in the other thread had statistical data to support the claim. If you get a chance post it again. I've looked for it in about 3 or 4 threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted November 2, 2012 Share Posted November 2, 2012 If you get a chance post it again. I've looked for it in about 3 or 4 threads. If I find it again I will....Don't remember what thread I put it in, but I can't locate it now. I do remember it was dated. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Charms Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 If I find it again I will....Don't remember what thread I put it in, but I can't locate it now. I do remember it was dated. Was it this? Incumbent Rule Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flotsam Posted November 3, 2012 Share Posted November 3, 2012 Not saying this guy is right or wrong, but put predicting who wins which state is up there with Joe Lunardi predicting who makes the NCAA tournament pool. We can name 45 of them right now. In 2008 there were about 3 or 4 question marks in the electoral college map. In 2008 (like this year) there were 8 or 9 battleground states. If a pollster goes 8 of 9 predicting the winner of Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, New Hampshire, Virginia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Nevada....:notworthy: :notworthy: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Charms Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 In 2008 (like this year) there were 8 or 9 battleground states. If a pollster goes 8 of 9 predicting the winner of Ohio, Florida, Iowa, Colorado, New Hampshire, Virginia, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania and Nevada....:notworthy: :notworthy: Missouri, Indiana, Florida, North Carolina & Ohio...that's not 8 or 9. The Electoral Map: Key States - Election Guide 2008 - The New York Times Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Charms Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 And I think you pretty much could apply the "incumbent rule" to McCain since Obama did such a GREAT job of making McCain look very much like Bush. That and Obama attacted a lot of independents with the way he ran a VERY well organized campaign in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lucky Charms Posted November 3, 2012 Author Share Posted November 3, 2012 And I think you pretty much could apply the "incumbent rule" to McCain since Obama did such a GREAT job of making McCain look very much like Bush. That and Obama attacted a lot of independents with the way he ran a VERY well organized campaign in 2008. ATTRACTED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts