UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Final Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 Yahoo still contends that Foster "only" had 38. Keep in mind that Yahoo knew Vandy won before ESPN did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
letabrotherspeak Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Final Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRCW Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Yahoo still contends that Foster "only" had 38. And Yahoo is still wrong. Foster's line per ESPN. 32 · S Foster 16/25 9/15 1/1 3 42 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRCW Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Final You're way to slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 And Yahoo is still wrong. Foster's line per ESPN. 32 · S Foster 16/25 9/15 1/1 3 42 Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Regardless, the kid is unreal and nobody is arguing he hit 9 (!) threes tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 I hope this doesn't end up mattering for UK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 He's pretty good... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Regardless, the kid is unreal and nobody is arguing he hit 9 (!) threes tonight. He hit 2 in the last minute of the game and then hit 2 the last minute of that OT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRCW Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Because that would mean you're right, and I'm wrong. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LRCW Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 He's pretty good... SEC player of the year IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D IT UP Posted March 6, 2008 Share Posted March 6, 2008 Yahoo is more up-to-date going by time. All there stats may not be correct but they usually have score and time right more than espn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 SEC player of the year IMO. I think this performance tonight cements it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 CBS Sportsline says 41. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKPat02 Posted March 6, 2008 Author Share Posted March 6, 2008 SI.com says 38 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts