March 6, 200818 yr Author Yahoo still contends that Foster "only" had 38. Keep in mind that Yahoo knew Vandy won before ESPN did.
March 6, 200818 yr Yahoo still contends that Foster "only" had 38. And Yahoo is still wrong. Foster's line per ESPN. 32 · S Foster 16/25 9/15 1/1 3 42
March 6, 200818 yr Author And Yahoo is still wrong. Foster's line per ESPN. 32 · S Foster 16/25 9/15 1/1 3 42 Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Regardless, the kid is unreal and nobody is arguing he hit 9 (!) threes tonight.
March 6, 200818 yr Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Regardless, the kid is unreal and nobody is arguing he hit 9 (!) threes tonight. He hit 2 in the last minute of the game and then hit 2 the last minute of that OT.
March 6, 200818 yr Why can't ESPN be wrong? 14-23 is what they have. Because that would mean you're right, and I'm wrong. :lol:
March 6, 200818 yr Yahoo is more up-to-date going by time. All there stats may not be correct but they usually have score and time right more than espn
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.