martstone Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 ^^^ What he said !:thumb: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Bluto Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 :thumb: Never understood those folks that think it's wrong to hold a performer's political positions and comments against that performer but think it's totally fine to refuse to buy products or own stock in companies that act in a manner they disagree with (ie, animal testing). The underlying motivation is applicable to both: not wanting to support someone or something that acts or believes in a manner I disagree with. I think you are expecting too much from those folks. You appear to want to seek consistency, and mutual understanding; they just want to make political points and acheive political advantage any way they can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westsider Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 I'm waiting for Larry Flynt to try to set this up as a pay-per-view ... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MountainThunder Posted February 9, 2009 Share Posted February 9, 2009 So, Ashley Judd's status as the world's best-known UK hoops fan makes her qualified to comment on wildlife issues? I guess she truly is a celebrity now!!! :thumb: I am with you on this one, don't think she is qualified. But she is still nice to look at! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trampler Posted February 12, 2009 Share Posted February 12, 2009 Let's feed Ashley Judd to the coyotes in Eastern Kentucky. That way they'll have someting to eat, besides our cattle, and we won't have to listen to her stupid ideas. Or watch her at UK games every 5-10 minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts