Anyone ever thought about trapping off of the screen??? Hmmmmm.

 

Or switching? Or bumping the cutter?

Might as well giveup, he's always right!

 

At least you're right there... :jump:

O how I long for the days of Tuddy.

 

Tubby took a national powerhouse and turned it into a mid-major team. But that's neither here nor there...

Because it was a two point game when the call was made and Patterson is one of a very few scoring threats available to UK.

 

 

Not that it changes your scenario but I thought it was a one-point game. The kid hit 2 to make it a 3 point game.

 

Bad call.

I blame some of that on coaching and some on a guy just having an unreal game.

Or switching? Or bumping the cutter?

 

Not a bad point of view considering I was called just a "fanofkyfootball".

 

What do you say happy ol' dad?

At least you're right there... :jump:

 

:banana:

Tubby took a national powerhouse and turned it into a mid-major team. But that's neither here nor there...

 

Very poor preparation and coaching lost this game today. UK has a good enough team to beat UAB if they know what to do against a 1-3-1 and the coach does not put the worst defender on the team on the opponents best shooter.

Crawford tried to "switch" once on Vaden but he was too deep for it that one play, I will give it that much.

Not that it changes your scenario but I thought it was a one-point game. The kid hit 2 to make it a 3 point game.

 

Bad call.

 

Yeah, you're right.

The coaching aspect that concerns me is that UK had no offensive set to combat the zone defense. I mean none...

If you think Porter is "tougher" than Crawford then I guess we'll just have to agree to disagree. If I am choosing IMO who the best defenders on the team are, yes Crawford is down that list, but he will never be below Porter.

 

Alright, then who do you put on Vaden? I'm just curious who on UK's team would have faired so much better than Porter.

Alright, then who do you put on Vaden? I'm just curious who on UK's team would have faired so much better than Porter.

 

Anyone who could at least jump or had the length to get in his grill.

Alright, then who do you put on Vaden? I'm just curious who on UK's team would have faired so much better than Porter.

 

Crawford, Bradley, Stevenson, Harris, Coury, Patterson, Porter, Krebs, Stewart...

The coaching aspect that concerns me is that UK had no offensive set to combat the zone defense. I mean none...

 

I agree, UK had no idea what hit them and Billy didnt make any adjustments.