HammerTime Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Why should the kicker be exempt from what is a penalty any other time when a defender leads with his helmet? I'm not exactly sure which one you ment because I didn't see that part of the play and the penalty wasn't for that. But oh well its done with now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Rutgers is what I thought they were... Really?? Cards win this one before the heart breaker in New Jersey... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 Really?? And as you have seen, I changed that this week and said the Cards would win. Rutgers went away from what they do best to start the game, and it provided the Cards a fast start. When they went back to it, the flow of the game changed. I'd say my assessment of Rutgers has been dead on... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim Schue Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 I'm not exactly sure which one you ment because I didn't see that part of the play and the penalty wasn't for that. But oh well its done with now. The second guy in after the guy who blocked it — the one whose helmet nailed the punter in the kicking leg when his leg was on the way back down. His arms weren't out, he lead with his helmet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 The second guy in after the guy who blocked it — the one whose helmet nailed the punter in the kicking leg when his leg was on the way back down. His arms weren't out, he lead with his helmet. If it's blocked, roughing is out. Did they call a personal foul? I missed the play... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UKMustangFan Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 If it's blocked, roughing is out. Did they call a personal foul? I missed the play... Yes, but it was for running into the kicker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Yes, but it was for running into the kicker. Correct not for leading with the helmet even if that was the case which I didn't see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 Yes, but it was for running into the kicker. Then it wasn't leading with the helmet. The call had to be no block... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. No Name Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 How can you not call PI there? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeuce Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Blown call...Oh well...It happens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 Thats a big drop there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 About to get interesting... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 HUGE PLAY...exactly what rutgers needed, got very lucky to recover that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HammerTime Posted November 10, 2006 Share Posted November 10, 2006 About to get interesting... That roughing the kicker is a little more controversial now. Rutgers is what I thought they were. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gametime Posted November 10, 2006 Author Share Posted November 10, 2006 Chasing points. Might be the best option for Rutgers... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts