Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

BluegrassPreps.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Potential National Title Game

Featured Replies

That's what I think. Otherwise, 'Bama is a lock. The only way they could end up not making it is if they win the west and get knocked off by Georgia.

 

The BCS is a spectacle. The way things have played out, LSU actually has a tougher road to secure a title berth than Alabama, IMO. They may have been better off losing that game in hindsight.

 

The Pac-10 might be able to put together an all-star team and give LSU or Alabama a close game.

 

I wholeheartedly agree with all of that. It is ironic, and it shows just how crazy this year has been. I would not be surprised if you see some revisions in the process following this year, like you used to every year people weren't 100% satisfied with the process.

  • Replies 256
  • Views 29.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

You know what I think would be awesome. And, I would love to see it play out this way.

 

Arkansas beats LSU and wins the west, then loses to Georgia, thus dropping below both LSU and Alabama. Leaving us with a BCS Championship game of two teams from the same division, neither of which won said division.

I posted the information about the tiebreaker upthread, but I'll rehash it a bit here.

 

In this scenario, we're assuming that Arkansas beats LSU and LSU drops behind both Alabama and Arkansas. At that point, which one is higher in the BCS becomes irrelevant. The three team tiebreaker says that the highest ranked team in the BCS goes to the title game unless the second highest team is five or less spots behind them in the BCS. If that is the case, it reverts to head to head between those two teams only. So since Alabama beat Arkansas, it won't matter which one is in front of the other since there is no way Alabama falls more than five spots behind Arkansas without a loss to Auburn which would make this moot anyway.

 

You're right I forgot about the fine print.

 

LSU-Bama here we come. Or Alabama-Arkansas.

You know what I think would be awesome. And, I would love to see it play out this way.

 

Arkansas beats LSU and wins the west, then loses to Georgia, thus dropping below both LSU and Alabama. Leaving us with a BCS Championship game of two teams from the same division, neither of which won said division.

That scenario is possible. I think LSU takes care of business, but I do think the sceneario is possible.
I wholeheartedly agree with all of that. It is ironic, and it shows just how crazy this year has been. I would not be surprised if you see some revisions in the process following this year, like you used to every year people weren't 100% satisfied with the process.

 

I think it is pretty obvious now after 5 straight years of SEC domination that will likely culminate in a sixth year that will feature the unbelievable scenario of two teams from the SEC west battling for the title...

 

The SEC Champion should be declared National Champion and they should have a BCS Title game for the other conferences.

 

Seriously, just like the big conferences have automatic BCS bids, I think the SEC should have an automatic BCS Title Game bid. :D

I say put Houston in the national title game.

Randy, Bama has had time to win a few games as other teams lost, LSU doesn't. They would have better off to lose to Bama and work their way back in. Now if LSU loses a very close game as we did that might help them, LSU just win out, they have that chance.

 

I understand what you're saying. I'm just saying it would be wrong for Alabama to leapfrog LSU at this point. What is the justification? Should Arkansas beat LSU, what has Alabama done since losing to LSU on Nov. 5th to justify moving them up?

Also, a special request, can we let LSU face Ohio State (just for my pleasure)?

Suppose Arkansas does beat LSU, how would you rank them Randy? It doesn't matter, you're screwing one of them over.

 

If you rank Arkansas #1, how is that fair to an Alabama team that beat them by 24? Arkansas has the potential to make this a mess. Otherwise, I think it is pretty clear at this point.

 

What if UGA is the only team to beat LSU?

 

That would be a quality win, but there are too many 1 loss teams that they would have to jump including a Boise team that they lost to.

I'll be honest. At this point, if LSU beats Arkansas and loses to Georgia in the SEC title game, I still think they and Alabama should be in the championship game. I still think their body of work would trump anyone else.

Suppose Arkansas does beat LSU, how would you rank them Randy? It doesn't matter, you're screwing one of them over.

 

If you rank Arkansas #1, how is that fair to an Alabama team that beat them by 24? Arkansas has the potential to make this a mess. Otherwise, I think it is pretty clear at this point.

 

If Arkansas goes on to beat UGA after beating LSU, I make it LSU/Arkansas. Should they lose to UGA, it's LSU/Alabama.

 

It's not that I'm partial to LSU, but I've thought since their first game vs. Oregon that they were the most impressive team in the country. They have as good a resume as anyone--better than both Alabama & Arkansas IMO. And they're just now playing with their primary Quarterback under center.

That would be a quality win, but there are too many 1 loss teams that they would have to jump including a Boise team that they lost to.

 

The thing about Boise, is that like some of the other teams that are in play, they will not win their conference. TCU has clinched that championship.

 

Stanford, Boise State, and two of the high SEC teams, these are teams that will not win their conference or even their division.

The thing about Boise, is that like some of the other teams that are in play, they will not win their conference. TCU has clinched that championship.

 

Stanford, Boise State, and two of the high SEC teams, these are teams that will not win their conference or even their division.

 

I was just wondering this...is Oklahoma State the only non-SEC team that can play for the National Title?

I understand what you're saying. I'm just saying it would be wrong for Alabama to leapfrog LSU at this point. What is the justification? Should Arkansas beat LSU, what has Alabama done since losing to LSU on Nov. 5th to justify moving them up?

 

Randy, they won and beat the teams on their schedule, All the other teams have lost this weekend, the SOS for Bama is ok too with Penn State winning. Who else would you put in Bama's place?

 

Again the SEC winner has no automatic bid into the BCSNCG, no conference does. We are #2 and we are in if we beat Auburn like Kirk said, "If Bama beats Auburn 2-0, they are still in, they won the game."

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.