Vetoing trades in Fantasy Football

[Blue Magic]

If you have a right to vote(veto) use it how you want regardless of the reason. As a commissioner, I'd allow it. As a competitor, I'd veto it if it is in a money league. Childish or not. Straight cash homey.

 

A lot of money...

[5wide]

The other guy's team would then be:

 

Vick

Thomas Jones

Forte

Brandon Jackson

Vincent Jackson

Terrell Owens

 

I know I want to veto partly because of the way the other guy's team looks, but I also want to veto because the trade is clearly so one sided. The discussion is going on in our league, I was just getting some other opinions on the matter.

 

This team looks pretty stacked as well. He doesn't need Rodgers, he adds two RB's and Vincent Jackson may be just as good as Jennings down the stretch.

 

I agree with Godot. There should be a cutoff on when trades can be made. That seems to work best, IMO.

[Blue Magic]

This team looks pretty stacked as well. He doesn't need Rodgers, he adds two RB's and Vincent Jackson may be just as good as Jennings down the stretch.

 

I agree with Godot. There should be a cutoff on when trades can be made. That seems to work best, IMO.

 

It's on Wednesday..

[PurplePride92]

A lot of money on the line....I am vetoing.

[Godot]

It's on Wednesday..

I'm talking, like week ten for a trade deadline, not Wednesday of each week

[Blue Magic]

I'm talking, like week ten for a trade deadline, not Wednesday of each week

 

Yeah. After week 11. On Wednesday...

[NEERFAN]

Money or no money, I wouldn't veto the trade. It doesn't appear to be collusion, he's trading a luxury for an apparent need. With that being said I like Tolbert but if I were him I'd be upping the ante a little bit and asking for a stud RB over the combo of Tolbert and Forte.