November 25, 201015 yr Author If you have a right to vote(veto) use it how you want regardless of the reason. As a commissioner, I'd allow it. As a competitor, I'd veto it if it is in a money league. Childish or not. Straight cash homey. A lot of money...
November 25, 201015 yr The other guy's team would then be: Vick Thomas Jones Forte Brandon Jackson Vincent Jackson Terrell Owens I know I want to veto partly because of the way the other guy's team looks, but I also want to veto because the trade is clearly so one sided. The discussion is going on in our league, I was just getting some other opinions on the matter. This team looks pretty stacked as well. He doesn't need Rodgers, he adds two RB's and Vincent Jackson may be just as good as Jennings down the stretch. I agree with Godot. There should be a cutoff on when trades can be made. That seems to work best, IMO.
November 25, 201015 yr Author This team looks pretty stacked as well. He doesn't need Rodgers, he adds two RB's and Vincent Jackson may be just as good as Jennings down the stretch. I agree with Godot. There should be a cutoff on when trades can be made. That seems to work best, IMO. It's on Wednesday..
November 25, 201015 yr It's on Wednesday..I'm talking, like week ten for a trade deadline, not Wednesday of each week
November 25, 201015 yr Author I'm talking, like week ten for a trade deadline, not Wednesday of each week Yeah. After week 11. On Wednesday...
November 26, 201015 yr Money or no money, I wouldn't veto the trade. It doesn't appear to be collusion, he's trading a luxury for an apparent need. With that being said I like Tolbert but if I were him I'd be upping the ante a little bit and asking for a stud RB over the combo of Tolbert and Forte.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.