38 minutes ago, theguru said:

Fixed it below!

Why in the world is Montana rooting for a team in LA? 

Interesting strategy that I heard someone speculate about on the radio today. The Rams might borrow a page from the Bengals book against the Chiefs and only rush 3 at times, thinking with Donald et al they will still get pressure against the Bengals o-line.

3 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Interesting strategy that I heard someone speculate about on the radio today. The Rams might borrow a page from the Bengals book against the Chiefs and only rush 3 at times, thinking with Donald et al they will still get pressure against the Bengals o-line.

If the Rams can get pressure with 3, it will be the first time all year.

14 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Interesting strategy that I heard someone speculate about on the radio today. The Rams might borrow a page from the Bengals book against the Chiefs and only rush 3 at times, thinking with Donald et al they will still get pressure against the Bengals o-line.

If the Rams do that, I hope Mixon runs for 150 yards.

14 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Why in the world is Montana rooting for a team in LA? 

Because it's closer?

18 hours ago, Voice of Reason said:

Why in the world is Montana rooting for a team in LA? 

People in Montana have good taste.

I saw a stat that said this is the lowest combined winning percentage ever of the teams participating in a Super Bowl.

31 minutes ago, bugatti said:

I saw a stat that said this is the lowest combined winning percentage ever of the teams participating in a Super Bowl.

Interesting. Who did the Steelers play that year they were a 9-7 wild card and won the Super Bowl?

34 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Interesting. Who did the Steelers play that year they were a 9-7 wild card and won the Super Bowl?

Was that the 2005 Steelers team? If so that would be Seattle and Seattle I believe was the one seed in the NFC. 

27 minutes ago, futurecoach said:

Was that the 2005 Steelers team? If so that would be Seattle and Seattle I believe was the one seed in the NFC. 

Looked it up. The Steelers were an 11-5 wild card. Worst record for a Super Bowl winner was the Giants at 9-7.

19 minutes ago, Voice of Reason said:

Looked it up. The Steelers were an 11-5 wild card. Worst record for a Super Bowl winner was the Giants at 9-7.

Correct. The Steelers that season, if memory serves, started 6-5 and won out.

8 hours ago, bugatti said:

I saw a stat that said this is the lowest combined winning percentage ever of the teams participating in a Super Bowl.

That's hard to imagine.  The Rams tied for the 3rd best NFC record (1 game back) and the Bengals tied for 4th best AFC record (2 games back). 

10 hours ago, bugatti said:

I saw a stat that said this is the lowest combined winning percentage ever of the teams participating in a Super Bowl.

My life's ambition is to win the slowest Kentucky Derby ever run.