For one season, you are given the opportunity to play any professional team sport. You are given the choice of being the best player on the worst team or the worst player on the best team. Your salary will be the same regardless of choice.

 

Which would you choose?

I would choose to be the worst player on the best team.

^^ this

I am a team player and believe what is best for the team. So being the worst on the best would be fine with me.

Easy. Worst player on the best team.

Worst for me. Winning is fun.

Your salary will be the same regardless of choice.

 

Good to add this caveat. I'd have taken best player on worst team because of the $$$.

Worst player on the best team for a couple reasons. The first being if I only get one chance at this thing I want to win. The second reason being that the sport I would choose is football, so I'd like to be buried so deep in the depth chart that I can sit comfortably on the sideline in a baseball hat where I'm not getting pummeled by 300 lb behemoths.

I guess I'm the single minority. I want to play. It would mean nothing to me to have a ring that I didn't earn by helping my teammates on the field. Let me play!

Pssssh... I'm balling like Jeremy Lin, saying some highly controversial stuff to move the needle, and getting myself a reality show after my contract extension runs out. No playoffs necessary.

Been both at rec levels. I'd take the worse on the best team. Winning is fun and breeds happiness for all. Plus if the team is that good, you end up with some playing time during blowouts.

I will play for Dallas.

I will be the worst on the best team. Go Cowboys!

Worst player on the best team if the money is the same. The best player on the worst team gets all the blame for the team sucking. No one cares about the worst player on the best team.

Money being the same I would be the worst player on the best team.

Best player worst team. Your the man and the team can't get any worse.