Jump to content

Patriots 35 Ravens 31


Recommended Posts

I wonder if we'll see a rule modification after this one. Pats used a formation where a receiver split out wide was ineligible. He did report as being ineligible which I think is required but he did it right before the snap. Harbaugh mentioned it after the game. Says the D never had a chance to adjust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we'll see a rule modification after this one. Pats used a formation where a receiver split out wide was ineligible. He did report as being ineligible which I think is required but he did it right before the snap. Harbaugh mentioned it after the game. Says the D never had a chance to adjust.

 

I hope not....why would we stifle innovation?

 

What is unwatchable to me is the allowance of d-backs to mug a receiver and/or just the inconsistency of how pass interference or holding a receiver is called.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if we'll see a rule modification after this one. Pats used a formation where a receiver split out wide was ineligible. He did report as being ineligible which I think is required but he did it right before the snap. Harbaugh mentioned it after the game. Says the D never had a chance to adjust.

 

There is no rule modification needed. The Pats informed the officials, the officials informed Baltimore, and Baltimore didn't make the adjustments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is no rule modification needed. The Pats informed the officials, the officials informed Baltimore, and Baltimore didn't make the adjustments.

 

Exactly. I'm not a Pats apologist and I hope they lose in the Super Bowl again but man Harbaugh is being a baby in this one. Read the rule book, John.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using the site you agree to our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use Policies.