January 11, 201313 yr I have no idea what this means. Disclaimer: I am not sure and doubt if December 14th represented a 'Hoax' as in nobody was killed or hurt and it was just a complete play stage event. Not at all. But things that come out in photos and video are not making sense. So please save the 'how can you' response. I simply present facts or objective as possible observations. If they are counter to the 'official story' from the government or MSM - so be it. What is posted is of one of the 'SWAT team members responding that day. The question is from what 'team'. State, FBI, ATF, DHS? Shoulder patch should provide that answer. The shoulder patch on this particular 'SWAT' member is what is called a morale emblem - sold on numerous internet webstores. Anyone can buy it and stick on their clothing. Its not official in any manner. So why would he have this emblem where usually there is a log of the function you are with - State Police, DHS, ATF, FBI... On the front is says 'State Police'. But none of these Camo SWAT Team people have any CT logos on them. None. So anyone, literally anyone can order that Spartan velcro patch slap in on their camo outfit - and even put 'State Police' on their chest and be a SWAT team member. Now Conneticut does have a SWAT unit. And they wear camo. But it is a different camo. They have CT STATE POLICE patches and they are much more uniform in their dress. And hopefully they handle their weapons a lot better than this rag-tag group. CT SWAT picture here. This actually was at Sandy hook on the 14th and also responded to the threat at a church. It is clearly a different unit than the rag-taggers. Other actual State sharp shooters or riflemen or SWAT members were at Sandy Hook as well. Picture here. Notice the two carrying rifles. Weapons at the ready. Probably Safeties off (notice finger straight out and not on the trigger) and they are scanning the environment - one looking right at photographer and other scanning to the groups right side. They are serious and on-duty and not taking anything for granted. They have a role - protecting the other officers also. Compare that to these guys. Picture here. Sloppy weapons handling. I would love for the former military or police to comment on how they are handling their weapons. No consistency to their uniform and not alert or attentive at all. So this no claim to a 'hoax'. But something just does not add up. Peace.
January 11, 201313 yr Disclaimer: I am not sure and doubt if December 14th represented a 'Hoax' as in nobody was killed or hurt and it was just a complete play stage event. Not at all. But things that come out in photos and video are not making sense. So please save the 'how can you' response. I simply present facts or objective as possible observations. If they are counter to the 'official story' from the government or MSM - so be it. What is posted is of one of the 'SWAT team members responding that day. The question is from what 'team'. State, FBI, ATF, DHS? Shoulder patch should provide that answer. The shoulder patch on this particular 'SWAT' member is what is called a morale emblem - sold on numerous internet webstores. Anyone can buy it and stick on their clothing. Its not official in any manner. So why would he have this emblem where usually there is a log of the function you are with - State Police, DHS, ATF, FBI... On the front is says 'State Police'. But none of these Camo SWAT Team people have any CT logos on them. None. So anyone, literally anyone can order that Spartan velcro patch slap in on their camo outfit - and even put 'State Police' on their chest and be a SWAT team member. Now Conneticut does have a SWAT unit. And they wear camo. But it is a different camo. They have CT STATE POLICE patches and they are much more uniform in their dress. And hopefully they handle their weapons a lot better than this rag-tag group. CT SWAT picture here. This actually was at Sandy hook on the 14th and also responded to the threat at a church. It is clearly a different unit than the rag-taggers. Other actual State sharp shooters or riflemen or SWAT members were at Sandy Hook as well. Picture here. Notice the two carrying rifles. Weapons at the ready. Probably Safeties off (notice finger straight out and not on the trigger) and they are scanning the environment - one looking right at photographer and other scanning to the groups right side. They are serious and on-duty and not taking anything for granted. They have a role - protecting the other officers also. Compare that to these guys. Picture here. Sloppy weapons handling. I would love for the former military or police to comment on how they are handling their weapons. No consistency to their uniform and not alert or attentive at all. So this no claim to a 'hoax'. But something just does not add up. Peace. It would appear that in the last photo that those guys are walking away from the action, after the fact. Is there a prescription for how to properly walk away from the event?
January 12, 201313 yr It would appear that in the last photo that those guys are walking away from the action, after the fact. Is there a prescription for how to properly walk away from the event? It's actually funny that this "hoax" crap has gone so far as to question the uniforms for the "SWAT" team for the Connecticut State Police. Google, "Connecticut State Police Tactical Unit" and check images. You will see several different pictures of different uniforms. I'd say it's not unusual for a tactical team to change the colors of their uniforms or to have several different styles. As for the way they're carrying their weapons... It's easy to MMQB a PICTURE. Especially one where you have absolutely no clue what the people in the picture are doing.
January 12, 201313 yr This internet Dick Tracy who is claiming the killings didn't happen, and any more idiots like him, should be escorted to Connecticut and placed in a locked room with the parents and family of each victim so that he could tell them face to face that it is all an elaborate trick.Have you went to the website and looked at the videos of the "parents" laughing and "auditioning" for the interviews with the media ? Or can you explain any of these questions ? 1) As yet, we have not seen any concrete evidence that any child died. 2) As yet, parents have not been allowed to see their children. (Photoshopped pictures do not count.) 3) As of now, I have seen only one unambiguous statement from a grieving parent (Robbie Parker). 4) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was found with his older brother’s ID, and it was not stolen. However, older brother Ryan–who officials say is very cooperative–claims not to have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And why does such use not qualify as a theft? 5) According to the official story, Adam Lanza was wearing a black outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest, if he planned to kill himself? 6) The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered with .223 (rifle) casings. But Adam Lanza was found dead in the school with only handguns–a rifle was found in the trunk of his car. But then he could not possibly have been firing the rifle, and could not have committed the murders. Who did? 7) According to the official story, the killing was tightly confined to two classrooms. But then why were so many children told to close their eyes while leaving the building? 8 ) Joanne Didonato, the principal’s secretary, called in sick on Friday–something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence. 9) The hospital went into lockdown and cleared four trauma rooms, but received only three patients, two of them dead children(according to the official story) and one mildly wounded adult. 10) Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school, when the new official story is that she was not connected to the school and was killed at home? 11) What happened to the report that Adam Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey? 12) What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to parents, “It wasn’t me.” Who was he and what was he doing there? 13) What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in the parking lot, or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they were on the lookout for? 14) The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector who obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her “autistic” son access to both guns and ammo? 15) Why were parents told on Friday that “if you haven’t been reunited with your child by now it’s already over”? Does anyone imagine that real parents of real children would simply say, “Okay, the show’s over, let’s go home now”? 16) Would real parents of real children really be satisfied with (possibly photoshopped) pictures of their children? Wouldn’t they demand to see their children one last time firsthand?17) According to the official story, 28 people died but only 1 was wounded. The dead included 20 small, squirmy children–difficult targets even for professionals. How could Adam Lanza achieve such amazingly deadly accuracy, in such a short length of time? 18 ) A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point? 19) Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself? 20) When Ryan Lanza was falsely identified as the shooter, who deleted his Facebook profile and created many others in his name? 21) Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a mask? 22) Why did the police say on Friday that they were going to leave the bodies rotting in the school until Sunday, then Saturday morning announce that they had spirited the bodies away in the middle of the night? Perhaps to ensure that the transport, if any, would go unrecorded on photos or video? 23) Why won’t police tell us where they found the Henry repeating rifle, the Enfield rifle, and the shotgun? 24) Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show? 25) Why did a police officer specifically mention, on radio, that “they’re coming at me through this wood,” followed by a fellow officer saying, “This is it”? 26) One officer in the school said, “We’ve got one suspect down.” Who was that? Down in this situation generally means in custody(on the ground and cuffed), not dead. 27) Why didn’t Adam’s uncle see anything out of the ordinary in Adam when the two saw each other in June? 28 ) Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said (oxymoronically), “[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a corner in school”? 29) Why did police assign an individual state trooper to every grieving family, whether the family wants such “protection” or not? 30) Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it’s for their own benefit? 31) Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza’s brother is Kingston Police Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home? 32) Since the alleged shooter’s father is VP of GE Capital, and (like “Batman shooter” James Holmes’s father) was scheduled to testify at the Senate Hearings on the LIBOR scandal, is there a LIBOR connection to this event?
January 12, 201313 yr Have you went to the website ...No I have not went to the website and, frankly, I don't intend to. I think it is an exercise in stupidity as well as a slap in the face to the memories of the victims to propagate the "hoax". So I am not going there. I didn't even read your post beyond the first paragraph.
January 12, 201313 yr No I have not went to the website and, frankly, I don't intend to. I think it is an exercise in stupidity as well as a slap in the face to the memories of the victims to propagate the "hoax". So I am not going there. I didn't even read your post beyond the first paragraph. I considered responding to it and finally decided it isn't worth it. People never cease to amaze me.
January 12, 201313 yr No I have not went to the website and, frankly, I don't intend to. I think it is an exercise in stupidity as well as a slap in the face to the memories of the victims to propagate the "hoax". So I am not going there. I didn't even read your post beyond the first paragraph.No problem, it's up to you. I consider a government lying to it's people a slap in the face, but that's just me. I choose not to drink O's kool-aid.
January 12, 201313 yr No problem' date=' it's up to you. I consider a government lying to it's people a slap in the face, but that's just me. I choose not to drink O's kool-aid.[/quote'] You have absolutely no proof of any lies regarding Sandy Hook. You have proof of the medias poor reporting and nothing more.
January 12, 201313 yr Maybe this explains the DHS exercise questions. Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division of Emergency Management and Homeland Security The target audience for this course is local and state emergency managers and planners, Child Services Agencies, NGO’s, Child Care Providers, Schools, and Faith-based Organizations. Location: 2800 Main Street, Bridgeport, CT 9 AM - 4 PM Held on December 14, 2012.
January 12, 201313 yr You have absolutely no proof of any lies regarding Sandy Hook. You have proof of the medias poor reporting and nothing more.Your correct, no proof. But when peoples stories don't add up, it's usually lies. And what about the parents(actors) laughing at the parent auditions ? Your child has just been murdered and you're laughing and then acting sad when the camera comes on ? C'mon.
January 12, 201313 yr Your correct, no proof. But when peoples stories don't add up, it's usually lies. And what about the parents(actors) laughing at the parent auditions ? Your child has just been murdered and you're laughing and then acting sad when the camera comes on ? C'mon. Sad, sad that people are questioning parents after their kids were murdered! Actually it's SICK! So, what happened? Did the parents agree to have their kids go missing? For how long? Forever? Don't people see the flaw in this? it would be impossible for even one set of parents and family members to agree to this, how impossible do you think 20 would be? The only other thing people that believe these theories is that the government allowed 20 kids to be murdered? Come on! As was said before, when a website claims to use the video or photos of the little girl with Obama and say it was the girl who was murdered, do you really think that the parents "forgot" that she was supposed to me dead? Another thing that has been said, people act differently in situations like this. It's one thing to be talking, but when you talk about your child being murdered your emotions change! Happens to me at times, after my mom passed away I was fine, until someone asked me about her and how I was handling it, then I got all emotional. Also, trying to laugh helps.
January 12, 201313 yr Your correct, no proof. But when peoples stories don't add up, it's usually lies. And what about the parents(actors) laughing at the parent auditions ? Your child has just been murdered and you're laughing and then acting sad when the camera comes on ? C'mon. I have no words for how ridiculous this post is.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.